util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

-   [StackOverflow: Ask "how-to" and "why-didn't-it-work" questions](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/ask?tags=guava+java)
-   [guava-discuss: For open-ended questions and discussion](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-discuss)

## IMPORTANT WARNINGS

1. APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level
are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

import okhttp3.testing.PlatformVersion
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension

/**
 * Java HTTP Client.
 *
 * https://openjdk.java.net/groups/net/httpclient/intro.html
 *
 * Baseline test if we ned to validate OkHttp behaviour against other popular clients.
 */
class JavaHttpClientTest {
  @JvmField @RegisterExtension
  val platform = PlatformRule()

            false, "keyword", 0, 0, null, null, false, null, null, null, null, null, false);
    protected final ColumnInfo _columnGroups = cci("groups", "groups", null, null, String[].class, "groups", null, false, false, false,
            "keyword", 0, 0, null, null, false, null, null, null, null, null, false);

import jcifs.smb.SmbException;

/**
 * Handle for Security Account Manager (SAM) domain operations.
 * This class represents an open handle to a SAM domain and provides
 * operations for managing domain users, groups, and aliases.
 */
public class SamrDomainHandle extends rpc.policy_handle implements AutoCloseable {

    private final DcerpcHandle handle;
    private boolean opened;

    /**

        artifactResolver.resolveTransitively(
                Collections.singleton(g), projectArtifact, remoteRepositories(), localRepository(), null);

        // we want to see all top-level thread groups
        ThreadGroup tg = Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup();
        while (tg.getParent() == null) {
            tg = tg.getParent();
        }

        ThreadGroup[] tgList = new ThreadGroup[tg.activeGroupCount()];

- Fixed a bug where the kubelet ephemerally failed with `failed to initialize top level QOS containers: root container [kubepods] doesn't exist`, due to the cpuset cgroup being deleted on cgroup v2 with systemd cgroup manager.
   ([#125923](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125923), [@haircommander](https://github.com/haircommander)) [SIG Node and Testing]