* publicly visible subclass), and I doubt any of our current or future Kotlin extensions for the
 * package will refer to the class. Plus, @ParametricNullness is only a temporary workaround,
 * anyway, so we just need to get by without the annotations here until Kotlin better understands
 * our other nullness annotations.
 */
final class Synchronized {
  private Synchronized() {}

     * purposes, the "count" field, tracking the number of elements, serves as that volatile
     * variable ensuring visibility. This is convenient because this field needs to be read in many
     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not
     * look at table entries if it is 0.
     *

					err = errFileNotFound
				}
			}
		}
		// when we have insufficient read quorum and inconsistent metadata return
		// file not found, since we can't possibly have a way to recover this object
		// anyway.
		if v, ok := err.(InsufficientReadQuorum); ok && v.Type == RQInconsistentMeta {
			if opts.VersionID != "" {
				err = errFileVersionNotFound
			} else {
				err = errFileNotFound
			}
		}

	if strings.Contains(stderr, "unrecognized command line option") {
		// We're using an old version of GCC that doesn't understand
		// -fdiagnostics-color. Those versions can't print color anyway,
		// so just rerun without that option.
		stderr = p.gccErrors(b.Bytes())
	}
	if stderr == "" {
		fatalf("%s produced no output\non input:\n%s", gccBaseCmd[0], b.Bytes())
	}

	completed := false

                // We do only really care if we open for writing and not shared for writing
                // otherwise there are no guarantees anyway, but this stuff is legacy anyways.
                SmbComSeek seekReq = new SmbComSeek(config, 0);
                seekReq.setMode(0x2); // from EOF
                SmbComSeekResponse seekResp = new SmbComSeekResponse(config);

     * purposes, the "count" field, tracking the number of elements, serves as that volatile
     * variable ensuring visibility. This is convenient because this field needs to be read in many
     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not
     * look at table entries if it is 0.
     *

              i++;
              /*
               * The cast is safe because of the containsKey check in hasNext(). (That means it's
               * unsafe under concurrent modification, but all bets are off then, anyway.)
               */
              return uncheckedCastNullableTToT(map.get(key));
            }

            @Override
            public void remove() {
              checkRemove(i == 1);

         * a key that appears once in `right` might appear multiple times in `left`). We don't
         * guarantee behavior in that case, anyway, and the current behavior is likely undesirable.
         * So that's either a reason to feel free to change it or a reason to not bother thinking
         * further about this.
         */

         * a key that appears once in `right` might appear multiple times in `left`). We don't
         * guarantee behavior in that case, anyway, and the current behavior is likely undesirable.
         * So that's either a reason to feel free to change it or a reason to not bother thinking
         * further about this.
         */

     * purposes, the "count" field, tracking the number of elements, serves as that volatile
     * variable ensuring visibility. This is convenient because this field needs to be read in many
     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not look
     * at table entries if it is 0.
     *