The same would happen if you had something like a <abbr title='A union between multiple types means "any of these types".'>union</abbr> between different types where one or more of them are not valid Pydantic types, for example this would fail 💥:

            }
        }
        if (rpc == null) {
            return false;
        }

        boolean valid = false;
        for (final int hash : rpc.getHashAlgos()) {
            if (hash == pc.getHashAlgos()[0]) {
                valid = true;
            }
        }
        if (!valid) {
            log.error("Server returned invalid hash selection");
            return false;
        }

        SmbFile parent = newParent();

        FileEntry invalid = entry(invalidName, SmbConstants.TYPE_SHARE);
        FileEntry valid = entry("ok", SmbConstants.TYPE_SHARE);
        Iterator<FileEntry> delegate = Arrays.asList(invalid, valid).iterator();

        ResourceFilter f = useFilter ? filter : null;
        if (useFilter) {
            when(filter.accept(any())).thenReturn(true);
        }

     * Verifies that configuration properties are properly validated during initialization.
     */
    @Test
    void testInitWithCIFSException() {
        // Test with valid configuration - should initialize successfully
        Map<String, String> validParams = new HashMap<>();
        validParams.put("jcifs.smb.client.domain", "TEST_DOMAIN");

     *
     * @see java.lang.AutoCloseable#close()
     */
    @Override
    void close() throws CIFSException;

    /**
     * Tests whether this file descriptor is open and valid.
     *
     * @return whether the FD is open and valid
     */
    boolean isOpen();

    /**
     * Tests whether this file descriptor was previously open but has become invalid.
     *

        assertFalse(validator.isValid("* * * *", context));
    }

    // Test common valid cron patterns that are likely to work
    public void test_basicValidCronExpressions() {
        final ConstraintValidatorContext context = null;

        // Test basic patterns that should be valid
        String[] potentiallyValidCrons = { "0 0 * * * ?", // Every hour
                "0 */15 * * * ?", // Every 15 minutes

    }

    @Test
    void testGetSecurityWithValidSecurityDescriptor() throws Exception {
        // Setup mock ShareInfo502 with a minimal valid security descriptor
        srvsvc.ShareInfo502 info502 = new srvsvc.ShareInfo502();
        // Create a minimal valid security descriptor binary
        // Format: revision(1) + sbz1(1) + control(2) + ownerOffset(4) + groupOffset(4) + saclOffset(4) + daclOffset(4) = 20 bytes minimum

    repo,
    pull_number: pr_number
  });
  if (pr_resp.status != 200 || pr_resp.data.state != 'closed') {
    console.log(`PR:{pr_number} is not found or closed.  Not a valid condition to create an issue.`);
    console.log(pr_resp);
    throw `PR:{pr_number} needs to be valid and closed (merged)`;
  }
  const pr_title = pr_resp.data.title;
  // Assign to PR owner and reviewers

    private FileEndOfFileInformation fileInfo;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        fileInfo = new FileEndOfFileInformation();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test default constructor creates valid instance")
    void testDefaultConstructor() {
        // Verify instance is created
        assertNotNull(fileInfo);
        assertEquals(FileInformation.FILE_ENDOFFILE_INFO, fileInfo.getFileInformationLevel());
    }

   * containers with a known order other than insertion order must override this method.
   *
   * <p>Note: This default implementation is overkill (but valid) for an unordered container. An
   * equally valid implementation for an unordered container is to throw an exception. The chosen
   * implementation, however, has the advantage of working for insertion-ordered containers, as
   * well.
   */