* @param severity The severity of the problem, must not be {@code null}.
     * @param message The detail message of the problem, may be {@code null}.
     * @param line The one-based index of the line containing the problem or {@code -1} if unknown.
     * @param column The one-based index of the column containing the problem or {@code -1} if unknown.
     * @param cause The cause of the problem, may be {@code null}.
     */

	"time"

	"gorm.io/gorm"
	. "gorm.io/gorm/utils/tests"
)

func TestUpdateHasOne(t *testing.T) {
	user := *GetUser("update-has-one", Config{})

	if err := DB.Create(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when create: %v", err)
	}

	user.Account = Account{Number: "account-has-one-association"}

	if err := DB.Save(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when update: %v", err)
	}

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

 * `::1` will reach the IPv6 server.
 *
 * By orchestrating two different servers with the same port but different IP addresses, we can
 * test what OkHttp does when both are reachable, or if only one is reachable.
 *
 * This test only runs on host machines that have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for localhost.
 */
@Timeout(30)
class FastFallbackTest {
  @RegisterExtension
  val clientTestRule = OkHttpClientTestRule()

            // unknown phases, leave in existing order
            return 0;
        }
        if (i1 == -1) {
            // second one is known, so it comes first
            return 1;
        }
        if (i2 == -1) {
            // first one is known, so it comes first
            return -1;
        }
        int rv = Integer.compare(i1, i2);
        if (rv != 0) {
            return rv;
        }

       *   setFuture called on it: Neither of those can happen until we've finished processing all
       *   the completed inputs. And we're still processing at least one input, the one that
       *   triggered handleException.)
       *
       * TODO(cpovirk): Think about whether we could/should use Verify to check the return value of
       * addCausalChain.
       */

/*
 * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 * distributed with this work for additional information
 * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
 * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT),
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.REPLACED))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("1", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("one", 2, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .testEquals();
  }

   * element, and the overall size of the collection, by one.
   *
   * <p>To both add the element and obtain the previous count of that element, use {@link
   * #add(Object, int) add}{@code (element, 1)} instead.
   *
   * @param element the element to add one occurrence of; may be null only if explicitly allowed by
   *     the implementation

     *            {@link ModelProblem.Severity#ERROR}.
     * @param source The source of the problem, may be {@code null}.
     * @param lineNumber The one-based index of the line containing the error or {@code -1} if unknown.
     * @param columnNumber The one-based index of the column containing the error or {@code -1} if unknown.
     * @param exception The exception that caused this problem, may be {@code null}.
     */