System.out.println("Response 1 response:          " + response1);
      System.out.println("Response 1 cache response:    " + response1.cacheResponse());
      System.out.println("Response 1 network response:  " + response1.networkResponse());
    }

    String response2Body;
    try (Response response2 = client.newCall(request).execute()) {

import java.net.InetAddress;
import java.net.NetworkInterface;
import java.net.SocketException;
import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
import java.nio.ByteOrder;

import jcifs.internal.util.SMBUtil;

/**
 * Information about a network interface for SMB3 Multi-Channel
 */
public class NetworkInterfaceInfo {

    private int interfaceIndex;
    private int capability;
    private int linkSpeed; // In units of 1 Mbps

 * }
 *
 * you will invoke it depending on the graph representation you're using.
 *
 * <p>If you have an instance of one of the primary {@code common.graph} types ({@link Graph},
 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work

 * }
 *
 * you will invoke it depending on the graph representation you're using.
 *
 * <p>If you have an instance of one of the primary {@code common.graph} types ({@link Graph},
 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.

- **Resource Layer**: `SmbResource` interface represents SMB network resources  
- **Protocol Layers**: Separate SMB1 (`jcifs.internal.smb1/`) and SMB2/3 (`jcifs.internal.smb2/`) implementations
- **Authentication**: NTLM, Kerberos, SPNEGO unified subsystem
- **Network Layer**: Transport abstraction, NetBIOS name resolution, session management

### Contributing

- Introduced a structured and versioned `v1alpha1` response format for the `flagz` endpoint. ([#134995](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134995), [@yongruilin](https://github.com/yongruilin)) [SIG API Machinery, Architecture, Instrumentation, Network, Node, Scheduling and Testing]

# Quite a few memory map
# areas may be consumed
vm.max_map_count=524288

# Default is 500000 = 0.5ms
kernel.sched_migration_cost_ns=5000000

# stalled hdd io threads
kernel.hung_task_timeout_secs=85

# network tuning for bigger throughput
net.core.netdev_max_backlog=250000
net.core.somaxconn=16384
net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=0
net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=16384
net.core.wmem_max=4194304
net.core.rmem_max=4194304

libcurand-13-0
libcusolver-dev-13-0
libcusparse-dev-13-0
libcublas-13-0
libcublas-dev-13-0
libnccl-dev=2.27.7-1+cuda13.0
libnccl2=2.27.7-1+cuda13.0
# CuDNN: https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/sdk/cudnn-install/index.html#ubuntu-network-installation
libcudnn9-headers-cuda-13=9.15.1.9-1
libcudnn9-static-cuda-13=9.15.1.9-1
libcudnn9-dev-cuda-13=9.15.1.9-1

#### Blocking APIs

Blocking APIs are convenient because you get top-to-bottom procedural code without indirection. Network calls work like regular method calls: ask for data and it is returned. If the request fails, you get a stacktrace right where the call was made.

Blocking APIs may be inefficient because you hold a thread idle while waiting on the network. Threads are expensive because they have both a memory overhead and a context-switching overhead.

- Fix Windows kube-proxy to prevent intermittent deletion of ClusterIP load balancers in HNS when internalTrafficPolicy=Local, ensuring stable service connectivity. ([#134032](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134032), [@princepereira](https://github.com/princepereira)) [SIG Network and Windows]