continue
		}
		mustFindInPolicy[key] = values
	}

	// Iterate over policy conditions and check them against received form fields
	for _, policy := range postPolicyForm.Conditions.Policies {
		// Form fields names are in canonical format, convert conditions names
		// to canonical for simplification purpose, so `$key` will become `Key`

						obj := db.Statement.ReflectValue.Index(i)
						if reflect.Indirect(obj).Kind() != reflect.Struct {
							break
						}
						if _, zero := rel.Field.ValueOf(db.Statement.Context, obj); !zero { // check belongs to relation value
							rv := rel.Field.ReflectValueOf(db.Statement.Context, obj) // relation reflect value
							if !isPtr {
								rv = rv.Addr()
							}
							objs = append(objs, obj)

from sqlmodel import Field, Session, SQLModel, create_engine

engine = create_engine("postgresql+psycopg://postgres:postgres@localhost/db")


class User(SQLModel, table=True):
    id: int | None = Field(default=None, primary_key=True)
    name: str


app = FastAPI()


def get_session():
    with Session(engine) as session:
        yield session

    extends AggregateFuture<V, C> {
  /*
   * We access this field racily but safely. For discussion of a similar situation, see the comments
   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */

    fields `username` and `password`.

    All the initialization parameters are extracted from the request.

    The only difference between `OAuth2PasswordRequestFormStrict` and
    `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is that `OAuth2PasswordRequestFormStrict` requires the
    client to send the form field `grant_type` with the value `"password"`, which

from typing import Union

from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI, HTTPException, Query
from sqlmodel import Field, Session, SQLModel, create_engine, select


class Hero(SQLModel, table=True):
    id: Union[int, None] = Field(default=None, primary_key=True)
    name: str = Field(index=True)
    age: Union[int, None] = Field(default=None, index=True)
    secret_name: str


sqlite_file_name = "database.db"

from pydantic import BaseModel, ConfigDict
from pydantic.fields import FieldInfo

from .utils import needs_py310


def test_model_field_default_required():
    from fastapi._compat import v2

    # For coverage
    field_info = FieldInfo(annotation=str)
    field = v2.ModelField(name="foo", field_info=field_info)
    assert field.default is Undefined


def test_complex():
    app = FastAPI()

    Field[] fields = type.getDeclaredFields();
    Arrays.sort(fields, BY_FIELD_NAME);
    for (Field field : fields) {
      if (Modifier.isPublic(field.getModifiers())
          && Modifier.isStatic(field.getModifiers())
          && Modifier.isFinal(field.getModifiers())) {
        if (field.getGenericType() == field.getType() && type.isAssignableFrom(field.getType())) {

その追加情報はそのまま出力され、JSON Schemaに追加されます。

## `Field`の追加引数

後述する`Field`、`Path`、`Query`、`Body`などでは、任意の引数を関数に渡すことでJSON Schemaの追加情報を宣言することもできます:

{* ../../docs_src/schema_extra_example/tutorial002.py hl[4,10,11,12,13] *}

/// warning | 注意

これらの追加引数が渡されても、文書化のためのバリデーションは追加されず、注釈だけが追加されることを覚えておいてください。

///

## `Body`の追加引数

追加情報を`Field`に渡すのと同じように、`Path`、`Query`、`Body`などでも同じことができます。

func (z *ChecksumInfo) DecodeMsg(dc *msgp.Reader) (err error) {
	var field []byte
	_ = field
	var zb0001 uint32
	zb0001, err = dc.ReadMapHeader()
	if err != nil {
		err = msgp.WrapError(err)
		return
	}
	for zb0001 > 0 {
		zb0001--
		field, err = dc.ReadMapKeyPtr()
		if err != nil {
			err = msgp.WrapError(err)
			return
		}
		switch msgp.UnsafeString(field) {
		case "PartNumber":
			z.PartNumber, err = dc.ReadInt()