import org.opensearch.monitor.os.OsStats;
import org.opensearch.monitor.process.ProcessProbe;

/**
 * This class is a timer target for monitoring system-level statistics.
 * It collects and logs information about the operating system, process,
 * JVM, and search engine.
 */
public class SystemMonitorTarget extends MonitorTarget {
    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(SystemMonitorTarget.class);

    /**

        .putShort((short) 0x0000)
        .putShort((short) 0x0000);
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());
  }

  public void testHashFloatIsStable() {
    // This is about the best we can do for floating-point
    Hasher hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putFloat(0x01000101f).putFloat(0f);
    assertEquals(0x96a4f8cc6ecbf16L, hasher.hash().asLong());

 * escaped in a general way.
 *
 * <p>A good example of usage of this class is for Java source code escaping where the replacement
 * array contains information about special ASCII characters such as {@code \\t} and {@code \\n}
 * while {@link #escapeUnsafe} is overridden to handle general escaping of the form {@code \\uxxxx}.
 *

                return "lang";
            }
        };
        ComponentUtil.setFessConfig(mockConfig);

        // Setup mock request manager with mixed case
        // LocaleUtils.toLocale is strict about case - it will throw exception for invalid format
        RequestManager mockRequestManager = createMockRequestManager("En_Us");

        // Execute

  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node
  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?

  private static final class LegacyAsyncDispatcher extends Dispatcher {

    // This dispatcher matches the original dispatch behavior of AsyncEventBus.
    //
    // We can't really make any guarantees about the overall dispatch order for this dispatcher in
    // a multithreaded environment for a couple of reasons:
    //
    // 1. Subscribers to events posted on different threads can be interleaved with each other

  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html
  // For a (long) discussion about this specific issue and the general futility of life.
  //
  // For the time being we are OK with the problem discussed above since it requires a caller to

  private val frameCallback: FrameCallback,
  private val perMessageDeflate: Boolean,
  private val noContextTakeover: Boolean,
) : Closeable {
  private var closed = false

  // Stateful data about the current frame.
  private var opcode = 0
  private var frameLength = 0L
  private var isFinalFrame = false
  private var isControlFrame = false
  private var readingCompressedMessage = false

  //    Imagine:
  //    guard.lock();
  //    try { /* monitor locked and guard satisfied here */ }
  //    finally { guard.unlock(); }
  // Here are Justin's design notes about this:
  //
  // This idea has come up from time to time, and I think one of my
  // earlier versions of Monitor even did something like this. I ended
  // up strongly favoring the current interface.
  //

### Choosing between application and network interceptors

Each interceptor chain has relative merits.

**Application interceptors**

 * Don't need to worry about intermediate responses like redirects and retries.
 * Are always invoked once, even if the HTTP response is served from the cache.