assertEquals(mockSid, pacGroup.getId(), "getId() should return the correct SID.");
    }

    /**
     * Test method for {@link jcifs.pac.PacGroup#getAttributes()}.
     */
    @Test
    void testGetAttributes() {
        // Test the getAttributes method
        assertEquals(attributes, pacGroup.getAttributes(), "getAttributes() should return the correct attributes.");
    }

        assertTrue(bytesWritten > 0);

        // Verify data is written at correct offset
        assertEquals(3, dst[startOffset]);

        // Verify total parameter count at correct offset
        assertEquals(500, SMBUtil.readInt4(dst, startOffset + 3));

        // Verify total data count at correct offset
        assertEquals(1000, SMBUtil.readInt4(dst, startOffset + 7));
    }

    @Test

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

    }

    /**
     * Test method for {@link jcifs.pac.PacSidAttributes#getAttributes()}.
     */
    @Test
    void testGetAttributes() {
        // Test the getAttributes method
        assertEquals(attributes, pacSidAttributes.getAttributes(), "getAttributes should return the correct attributes.");
    }

        mockPolicyHandle = mock(SamrPolicyHandle.class);
        testServer = "testServer";
        testAccess = 0x02000000; // SAM_SERVER_CONNECT access right
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should construct with correct parameters")
    void constructorShouldInitializeFieldsCorrectly() {
        // When
        MsrpcSamrConnect2 msrpcSamrConnect2 = new MsrpcSamrConnect2(testServer, testAccess, mockPolicyHandle);

        // Then

        assertEquals(0x00, trans.maxSetupCount);
        assertEquals(2, trans.setupCount);
        assertEquals("\\PIPE\\", trans.name);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeSetupWireFormat writes correct data")
    void testWriteSetupWireFormat() {
        // Arrange
        TransTransactNamedPipe trans = new TransTransactNamedPipe(mockConfig, TEST_FID, TEST_DATA, TEST_OFFSET, TEST_LENGTH);
        byte[] dst = new byte[10];

    class ConstantsTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct FLAGS_NAME_LIST_REFERRAL value")
        void testFlagsNameListReferralConstant() {
            assertEquals(0x0002, Trans2GetDfsReferralResponse.FLAGS_NAME_LIST_REFERRAL);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct FLAGS_TARGET_SET_BOUNDARY value")
        void testFlagsTargetSetBoundaryConstant() {

	formatConfigFile = "format.json"
)

const (
	// Version of the formatMetaV1
	formatMetaVersionV1 = "1"
)

// format.json currently has the format:
// {
//   "version": "1",
//   "format": "XXXXX",
//   "XXXXX": {
//
//   }
// }
// Here "XXXXX" depends on the backend, currently we have "fs" and "xl" implementations.
// formatMetaV1 should be inherited by backend format structs. Please look at format-fs.go

    List<String> expectedEvents = new ArrayList<>();
    expectedEvents.add(EVENT);
    expectedEvents.add(EVENT);

    assertEquals("Two correct events should be delivered.", expectedEvents, catcher1.getEvents());

    assertEquals(
        "One correct event should be delivered.", Lists.newArrayList(EVENT), catcher2.getEvents());

    bus.unregister(catcher1);
    bus.post(EVENT);

    assertEquals(

    segment = cache.segments[0];
    chain = null;
    for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
      Object key = new Object();
      // TODO(b/145386688): This access should be guarded by 'this.segment', which is not currently
      // held
      chain = segment.newEntry(key, cache.hash(key), chain);
      if (i == 0) {
        head = chain;
      }
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("GuardedBy")
  @Benchmark