Assertions.assertEquals(3, results[i].length, "Thread " + i + " got wrong array length");
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test that volatile fields ensure visibility across threads.
     * Verify that changes to lastLoadedTime are visible to all threads.
     */
    @Test
    public void test_volatileFields_visibility() throws Exception {
        final DataStoreFactory testFactory = new DataStoreFactory() {

              <include>org.apache.maven.toolchain</include>
              <include>org.apache.maven.usability</include>
            </includes>
            <!-- allowed non-binary backwards compatible changes -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- START default constructor on Plexus/JSR 330 components -->
              <exclude>org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor#DefaultLifecycleExecutor()</exclude>

		return
	}

	cfg := globalServerConfig.Clone()

	var s strings.Builder
	hkvs := config.HelpSubSysMap[""]
	for _, hkv := range hkvs {
		// We ignore the error below, as we cannot get one.
		cfgSubsysItems, _ := cfg.GetSubsysInfo(hkv.Key, "", false)

		for _, item := range cfgSubsysItems {
			off := item.Config.Get(config.Enable) == config.EnableOff
			switch hkv.Key {
			case config.EtcdSubSys:

 * Ordering} to be of type {@code Comparator} instead. However, at this time we have no plan to
 * <i>deprecate</i> this class.
 *
 * <p>Many replacements involve adopting {@code Stream}, and these changes can sometimes make your
 * code verbose. Whenever following this advice, you should check whether {@code Stream} could be
 * adopted more comprehensively in your code; the end result may be quite a bit simpler.
 *

    }

    @Override
    public OneSizeTestContainerGenerator<Map<K, V>, Entry<K, V>> getInnerGenerator() {
      return mapGenerator;
    }
  }

  // TODO: investigate some API changes to SampleElements that would tidy up
  // parts of the following classes.

  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      TestSetGenerator<K> keySetGenerator(

	// MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY_FILE is set to a path that does not exist,
	// the server does not complain and start without a KMS config.
	//
	// Until the container image changes, this behavior has to be preserved.
	if isPresent(EnvKMSSecretKey) && os.Getenv(EnvKMSSecretKey) == "" {
		os.Unsetenv(EnvKMSSecretKey)
	}
	if isPresent(EnvKMSSecretKeyFile) {

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

But if we use the same model for another *path operation*, we could be sending our user's passwords to every client.

/// danger

Never store the plain password of a user or send it in a response like this, unless you know all the caveats and you know what you are doing.

///

## Add an output model { #add-an-output-model }

             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs:

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Will watch for changes in these directories:
             <b>[</b><font color="#4E9A06">&apos;/home/user/code/awesomeapp&apos;</font><b>]</b>

Neste caso, pode não ser um problema, porque é o mesmo usuário enviando a senha.

Mas se usarmos o mesmo modelo para outra *operação de rota*, poderíamos estar enviando as senhas dos nossos usuários para todos os clientes.

/// danger | Cuidado

Nunca armazene a senha simples de um usuário ou envie-a em uma resposta como esta, a menos que você saiba todas as ressalvas e saiba o que está fazendo.

///

## 带作用域的 JWT 令牌 { #jwt-token-with-scopes }

现在，修改令牌的*路径操作*以返回请求的作用域。

我们仍然使用 `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm`。它包含 `scopes` 属性，其值是 `list[str]`，包含请求中接收到的每个作用域。

我们把这些作用域作为 JWT 令牌的一部分返回。

/// danger | 危险

为简单起见，此处我们只是把接收到的作用域直接添加到了令牌中。

但在你的应用里，为了安全起见，你应该只添加该用户实际能够拥有的作用域，或你预先定义的作用域。

///

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[157] *}