* make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    <T extends Number & CharSequence> void withUpperBound(List<T> list) {}

    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {

    ExecutorService executor = newFixedThreadPool(threadCount);
    final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(threadCount);
    ImmutableList.Builder<Future<?>> futures = ImmutableList.builder();
    for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
      futures.add(
          executor.submit(
              new Callable<@Nullable Void>() {
                @Override
                public @Nullable Void call() throws Exception {

    <suppress checks="JavadocPackage"
              files=".*[/\\]platforms[/\\]jvm[/\\]plugins-jvm-test-fixtures[/\\]src[/\\]main[/\\]java[/\\]org[/\\]gradle[/\\]api[/\\]plugins[/\\][^/\\]+"/>
    <suppress checks="JavadocPackage"

 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.base.Strings.isNullOrEmpty;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.getDone;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;

import com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal.InternalFutureFailureAccess;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;

  // checked against the backoffLimit. This field cannot be used in combination
  // with restartPolicy=OnFailure.
  //
  // This field is alpha-level. To use this field, you must enable the
  // `JobPodFailurePolicy` feature gate (disabled by default).
  // +optional
  optional PodFailurePolicy podFailurePolicy = 11;

  // Specifies the number of retries before marking this job failed.
  // Defaults to 6
  // +optional

    public static final String NAME = "sltr";

    public static final ParseField MODEL_NAME = new ParseField("model");
    public static final ParseField FEATURESET_NAME = new ParseField("featureset");
    public static final ParseField STORE_NAME = new ParseField("store");
    public static final ParseField PARAMS = new ParseField("params");

## Installing

The new installer is intended to be modular and very explicit about what is installed. It has
far more steps than the Istio installer - but each step is smaller and focused on a specific
feature, and can be performed by different people/teams at different times.

It is strongly recommended that different namespaces are used, with different service accounts.

 * consider <a href="https://github.com/lukas-krecan/future-converter">Future Converter</a>.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 10.0 (replacing {@code Futures.makeListenable}, which existed in 1.0)
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class JdkFutureAdapters {
  /**

 * if it is present on the connection spec. The same policy also applies to cipher suites.
 *
 * Use [Builder.allEnabledTlsVersions] and [Builder.allEnabledCipherSuites] to defer all feature
 * selection to the underlying SSL socket.
 *
 * The configuration of each spec changes with each OkHttp release. This is annoying: upgrading