*
   * <p>For example, if {@code rangeMap} had the entries {@code [1, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar",
   * (10, ∞) => "baz"} then {@code rangeMap.subRangeMap(Range.open(3, 12))} would return a range map
   * with the entries {@code (3, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar", (10, 12) => "baz"}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map supports all optional operations that this range map supports, except

            Toolchain identification information, which will be matched against project requirements.
            <p>For Maven 2.0.9 to 3.2.3, the actual content structure was completely open: each toolchain type would
            define its own format and semantics. This was generally a properties format.
            <p>Since Maven 3.2.4, the type for this field has been changed to Properties to match the de-facto
            format.

func podAndNetns() (*v1.Pod, *fakeNs) {
	devNull, err := os.Open(os.DevNull)
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	// we can't close this now, because we need to pass it from the ztunnel server to the client
	// it would leak, but this is a test, so we don't care
	//	defer devNull.Close()

	id := ztunnelTestCounter.Add(1)
	pod := &v1.Pod{
		ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
			Name: fmt.Sprintf("name-%d", id),

		case 16:
			t.Go = c.complex128
		}
		if t.Align = t.Size / 2; t.Align >= c.ptrSize {
			t.Align = c.ptrSize
		}

	case *dwarf.FuncType:
		// No attempt at translation: would enable calls
		// directly between worlds, but we need to moderate those.
		t.Go = c.uintptr
		t.Align = c.ptrSize

	case *dwarf.IntType:
		if dt.BitSize > 0 {

   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.
   *
   * <p>This method does not create any memory pressure as would be required to cause soft
   * references to be processed.
   *
   * @throws RuntimeException if timed out or interrupted while waiting
   * @since 12.0
   */

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

      public int resultIndex(int higherIndex) {
        return higherIndex;
      }
    },
    /**
     * Return {@code ~insertionIndex}, where {@code insertionIndex} is defined as the point at which
     * the key would be inserted into the list: the index of the next higher element in the list, or
     * {@code list.size()} if there is no such element.
     *

      return Optional.absent();
    }

    /*
     * TODO(kevinb): consider whether this "optimization" is worthwhile. Users with SortedSets tend
     * to know they are SortedSets and probably would not call this method.
     */
    if (iterable instanceof SortedSet) {
      SortedSet<E> sortedSet = (SortedSet<E>) iterable;
      return Optional.of(sortedSet.last());
    }

    while (true) {

  /**
   * Returns an unmodifiable view of the intersection of two multisets. In the returned multiset,
   * the count of each element is the <i>minimum</i> of its counts in the two backing multisets,
   * with elements that would have a count of 0 not included. The iteration order of the returned
   * multiset matches that of the element set of {@code multiset1}, with repeated occurrences of the
   * same element appearing consecutively.
   *

  /**
   * Returns an unmodifiable view of the intersection of two multisets. In the returned multiset,
   * the count of each element is the <i>minimum</i> of its counts in the two backing multisets,
   * with elements that would have a count of 0 not included. The iteration order of the returned
   * multiset matches that of the element set of {@code multiset1}, with repeated occurrences of the
   * same element appearing consecutively.
   *