* even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {
    int size = random.nextInt(8) + 1;

   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet
   *     other type variables, in which case these type variables will be further resolved if

              if (entry.getLowerBound().compareTo(subRange.upperBound) >= 0) {
                return endOfData();
              } else if (entry.getUpperBound().compareTo(subRange.lowerBound) > 0) {
                // this might not be true e.g. at the start of the iteration
                return immutableEntry(entry.getKey().intersection(subRange), entry.getValue());
              }
            }
            return endOfData();
          }

 *
 * <tr>
 * <td ><code>smb://angus/</code></td>
 * <td>
 * This references only a server. The behavior of some methods is different
 * in this context(e.g. you cannot <code>delete</code> a server) however
 * as you might expect the <code>list</code> method will list the available
 * shares on this server.
 * </td>
 * </tr>
 *
 * <tr>
 * <td ><code>smb://angus.foo.net/d/jcifs/pipes.doc</code></td>
 * <td>

     * provide a better implementation than the input Collection, at least without dramatic changes
     * like copying it to a new Set—which might then test for element equality differently.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("UndefinedEquals")
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof InPredicate) {

  <T extends @Nullable Object> Ordering<T> generateOrdering() {
    return new Ordering<T>() {
      @Override
      @SuppressWarnings("UnusedVariable") // intentionally weird Comparator
      public int compare(T left, T right) {
        return 0;
      }

      final String string = paramString(Ordering.class, generateInt());

      @Override
      public String toString() {
        return string;
      }
    };

    /*
     * These gymnastics are a little confusing. Basically this class has neither legacy nor
     * non-legacy behavior; it just needs to let the behaviors of the backing converters shine
     * through (which might even differ from each other!). So, we override the correctedDo* methods,
     * after which the do* methods should never be reached.
     */

    @Override
    protected C doForward(A a) {

         *
         * In theory, cancel() could execute arbitrary listeners -- bad to do while holding a lock.
         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to

		for j := i; j <= 5; j++ {
			for k := 0; k <= 6; k++ {
				// 0 <= i <= j <= 5; 0 <= k <= 6
				// Check that if we start with a buffer
				// of length j at offset i and ask for
				// Next(k), we get the right bytes.
				buf := NewBuffer(b[0:j])
				n, _ := buf.Read(tmp[0:i])
				if n != i {
					t.Fatalf("Read %d returned %d", i, n)
				}
				bb := buf.Next(k)
				want := k
				if want > j-i {

      ListenableFuture<? extends V>... futures) {
    /*
     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only