public boolean equals(Object other) {
        if (this == other) {
            return true;
        } else if (other instanceof ToolchainModel that) {
            return java.util.Objects.equals(this.getType(), that.getType())
                && java.util.Objects.equals(this.getProvides(), that.getProvides());
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    } //-- boolean equals(Object)
                ]]>

      // it is a name, all IPs for that name should be tried. If it is an IP address, only that IP
      // address should be tried.
      val address = address ?: return hostName

      // The InetSocketAddress has a specific address: we should only try that address. Therefore we
      // return the address and ignore any host name that may be available.
      return address.hostAddress
    }
  }

          @SuppressWarnings({"removal", "Finalize"}) // b/487687332
          @Override
          protected void finalize() {
            latch.countDown();
          }
        };
    unused = null; // Hint to the JIT that unused is unreachable
    GcFinalization.await(latch);
    assertEquals(0, latch.getCount());
  }

  public void testAwaitDone_future() {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> future = SettableFuture.create();

       - The compressed index.xml file contains a timestamp property which
       changes with every test execution, such that running the test
       actually changes the test classpath itself. This means that it
       can"t benefit from incremental build acceleration, because on every
       execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:

    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:

    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:

  private final @Nullable Comparator<T> comparator;

  /**
   * The type of ordering that this object specifies.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>UNORDERED: no order is guaranteed.
   *   <li>STABLE: ordering is guaranteed to follow a pattern that won't change between releases.
   *       Some methods may have stronger guarantees.
   *   <li>INSERTION: insertion ordering is guaranteed.

    ],
)

# Config setting that is satisfied when TensorFlow is being built with CUDA
# support through e.g. `--config=cuda` (or `--config=cuda_clang` in OSS).
alias(
    name = "is_cuda_enabled",
    actual = if_oss(
        "@local_config_cuda//:is_cuda_enabled",
        "@local_config_cuda//cuda:using_config_cuda",
    ),
)

# Config setting that is satisfied when CUDA device code should be compiled

      return;
    }
    fail("Should have failed");
  }

  /** An interface for the 2 ways that a chaining call might be defined. */
  private interface ChainingCalls {
    // A method that is defined to 'return this'
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    ChainingCalls chainingCall();

    // A method that just happens to return a ChainingCalls object
    ChainingCalls nonChainingCall();
  }