private final long totalLoadTime;

  private final long evictionCount;

  /**
   * Constructs a new {@code CacheStats} instance.
   *
   * <p>Five parameters of the same type in a row is a bad thing, but this class is not constructed
   * by end users and is too fine-grained for a builder.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public CacheStats(
      long hitCount,

to it. Whether Go memory is pinned is a dynamic property of that memory
region; it has nothing to do with the type of the pointer.

Go values created by calling new, by taking the address of a composite
literal, or by taking the address of a local variable may also have their
memory pinned using [runtime.Pinner]. This type may be used to manage
the duration of the memory's pinned status, potentially beyond the

   */
  protected abstract Iterable<? extends Stimulus<E, ? super I>> getStimulusValues();

  /**
   * Returns a new target iterator each time it's called. This is the iterator you are trying to
   * test. This must return an Iterator that returns the expected elements passed to the constructor
   * in the given order. Warning: it is not enough to simply pull multiple iterators from the same

    assert200Http2Response(execute(sanUrl), "san.com")
    assertThat(client.connectionPool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.

      "certChain": []
    },
    {
      "identity": "spiffe://cluster.local/ns/istio-system/sa/istiod",
      "state": "Unavailable: signing gRPC error (The service is currently unavailable): error trying to connect: TLS handshake failed: cert verification failed - unable to get local issuer certificate [CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]",
      "certChain": []
    }
  ]

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableIntArray iia = ImmutableIntArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableDoubleArray iia = ImmutableDoubleArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);

  // ResourceClaimSpec.
  // +optional
  optional ResourceClassParametersReference parametersRef = 3;

  // Only nodes matching the selector will be considered by the scheduler
  // when trying to find a Node that fits a Pod when that Pod uses
  // a ResourceClaim that has not been allocated yet.
  //
  // Setting this field is optional. If null, all nodes are candidates.
  // +optional

      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.UNSATISFIED_AND_INTERRUPTED_BEFORE_WAITING,
          TimeoutsToUse.PAST,
          // prefer responding to interrupt over timing out
          isInterruptible(method) ? Outcome.INTERRUPT : Outcome.FAILURE);
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.UNSATISFIED_AND_INTERRUPTED_BEFORE_WAITING,

navigate to the
[GitHub "issues" tab](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues) and start
looking through interesting issues. If you are not sure of where to start, then
start by trying one of the smaller/easier issues here i.e.
[issues with the "good first issue" label](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/labels/good%20first%20issue)
and then take a look at the