Here are the affected tests:
EOF
    while read dep; do
      echo "For dependency $dep:"
      # For every missing dependency, find the tests which directly depend on
      # it, and print that list for debugging. Not really clear if this is
      # helpful since the only examples I've seen are enormous.

          "",
        )
      },
    ).containsExactly(
      "callStart: Request{method=GET, url=http://google.com/robots.txt}",
      "proxySelectStart: http://google.com/",
      "proxySelectEnd: [DIRECT]",
      "dnsStart: google.com",
      "callFailed: java.net.UnknownHostException: shortcircuit",
    )
    // We should consider if these logs should retain Exceptions
    assertThat(logs.last().throwable).isNull()

import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.service.CrawlingInfoService;
import org.codelibs.fess.exception.FessSystemException;
import org.codelibs.fess.mylasta.direction.FessConfig;
import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.client.SearchEngineClient;
import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity.CrawlingConfig;
import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity.CrawlingInfo;

import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.entity.UrlQueue;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.util.CrawlingParameterUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.util.FieldConfigs;
import org.codelibs.fess.mylasta.direction.FessConfig;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.ComponentUtil;

/**
 * Interface for transforming and processing crawled documents in Fess.
 * Provides utility methods for URL processing, site extraction, data mapping,

      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.

Try to avoid using bitter sarcasm or potentially passive-aggressive comments. If something is wrong, it's better to be direct (try to be gentle) than sarcastic.

Try to be as specific and objective as possible, avoid generalizations.

For conversations that are more difficult, for example to reject a PR, you can ask me (@tiangolo) to handle it directly.

## Edit PR Titles

### Retorne uma Response diretamente { #return-a-response-directly }

O caso mais comum seria [retornar uma Response diretamente, conforme explicado posteriormente na documentação avançada](../advanced/response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_02_py39.py hl[8,10:11] *}

        SmbComClose smbComClose = new SmbComClose(config, fid, lastWriteTime);

        // Then
        assertEquals(ServerMessageBlock.SMB_COM_CLOSE, smbComClose.getCommand());
        // Private fields are not directly accessible, but we can check their effect in other methods.
    }

    /**
     * Test method for {@link jcifs.internal.smb1.com.SmbComClose#writeParameterWordsWireFormat(byte[], int)}.
     */
    @Test

   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

  private final String relationshipName;
  private final String hashName;

import java.util.Set;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tests for {@link Multimap#asMap}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")