assertTrue(actual.contains("192.168.1.1"), "toString should contain the first NbtAddress string representation");
        assertTrue(actual.contains("10.0.0.5"), "toString should contain the second NbtAddress string representation");
    }

    /**
     * Helper method to set common superclass fields for successful parsing scenarios.
     */

     *   <li>Creates crawler threads for each data configuration</li>
     *   <li>Manages concurrent execution based on thread count limits</li>
     *   <li>Monitors thread completion and handles cleanup</li>
     *   <li>Records execution timing and statistics</li>
     * </ul>
     *
     * @param sessionId unique identifier for this crawling session
     * @param configList list of data configurations to crawl
     */

   - Multi-channel provides >1.5x throughput improvement
   - RDMA reduces latency by >50%
3. **Reliability**: 
   - Persistent handles survive 99% of network interruptions
   - Witness protocol achieves <5 second failover time
4. **Compatibility**: Works with Windows Server 2016+ and Azure Files

## Next Steps

1. **Immediate Actions**:
   - Set up Windows Server test environment

	}

	for _, testCase := range testCases {
		u, err := url.Parse(testCase.releaseChecksumURL)
		if err != nil {
			t.Fatal(err)
		}

		result, err := downloadReleaseURL(u, 1*time.Second, "")
		switch {
		case testCase.expectedErr == nil:
			if err != nil {
				t.Fatalf("error: expected: %v, got: %v", testCase.expectedErr, err)
			}
		case err == nil:

   * equivalent {@link Long#compareUnsigned(long, long)} method instead.
   *
   * @param a the first unsigned {@code long} to compare
   * @param b the second unsigned {@code long} to compare
   * @return a negative value if {@code a} is less than {@code b}; a positive value if {@code a} is
   *     greater than {@code b}; or zero if they are equal
   */

        // Remove one instance
        assertTrue(ruleManager.removeRule(rule));
        assertEquals(1, ruleManager.getRuleCount());
        assertTrue(ruleManager.hasRule(rule));

        // Remove second instance
        assertTrue(ruleManager.removeRule(rule));
        assertEquals(0, ruleManager.getRuleCount());
        assertFalse(ruleManager.hasRule(rule));
    }

    /**
     * Test empty RuleManager

          }
        }
      if (!acquired) continue

      // Confirm the connection is healthy and return it.
      if (connection.isHealthy(doExtensiveHealthChecks)) return connection

      // In the second synchronized block, release the unhealthy acquired connection. We're also on
      // the hook to close this connection if it's no longer in use.
      val noNewExchangesEvent: Boolean
      val toClose: Socket? =

        FileNotifyInformation info1 = notifications.get(0);
        assertEquals(FileNotifyInformation.FILE_ACTION_ADDED, info1.getAction());
        assertEquals("test1.txt", info1.getFileName());

        // Verify second notification
        FileNotifyInformation info2 = notifications.get(1);
        assertEquals(FileNotifyInformation.FILE_ACTION_MODIFIED, info2.getAction());
        assertEquals("test2.txt", info2.getFileName());
    }

        smbInfoAllocation.decode(buffer1, 0, buffer1.length);

        long firstCapacity = smbInfoAllocation.getCapacity();
        long firstFree = smbInfoAllocation.getFree();

        // Second decode with different values
        byte[] buffer2 = new byte[22];
        offset = 0;
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(0, buffer2, offset); // idFileSystem
        offset += 4;

Quand vous créez des *fonctions de chemins*, vous pouvez vous retrouver dans une situation où vous avez un chemin fixe.

Tel que `/users/me`, disons pour récupérer les données sur l'utilisateur actuel.

Et vous avez un second chemin : `/users/{user_id}` pour récupérer de la donnée sur un utilisateur spécifique grâce à son identifiant d'utilisateur