* Created a new `dryRun` query parameter for mutating endpoints. If the parameter is set, then the query will be rejected, as the feature is not implemented yet. This will allow forward compatibility with future clients; otherwise, future clients talking with older apiservers might end up modifying a resource even if they include the `dryRun` query parameter. ([#63557](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63557), [@apelisse](...

	// fmt.Printf("lastReq: %#v\n", lastReq.URL.String())

	// On form submission, the last redirect response contains the auth
	// code, which we now have in `lastReq`. Exchange it for a JWT id_token.
	q := lastReq.URL.Query()
	// fmt.Printf("lastReq.URL: %#v q: %#v\n", lastReq.URL, q)
	code := q.Get("code")
	oauth2Token, err := oauth2Config.Exchange(ctx, code)
	if err != nil {

	}

	// Read escaped copy source path to check for parameters.
	cpSrcPath := r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzCopySource)
	var vid string
	if u, err := url.Parse(cpSrcPath); err == nil {
		vid = strings.TrimSpace(u.Query().Get(xhttp.VersionID))
		// Note that url.Parse does the unescaping
		cpSrcPath = u.Path
	}

	srcBucket, srcObject := path2BucketObject(cpSrcPath)

    * - Fix a bug in DNS resolution for externalName services and PTR records that need to query from upstream nameserver.



# v1.8.11

[Documentation](https://docs.k8s.io) & [Examples](https://releases.k8s.io/release-1.8/examples)

## Downloads for v1.8.11


filename | sha256 hash

### آیا هم‌زمانی از موازی‌سازی بهتره؟

نه! این نتیجه داستان نیست.

 *         .catching(DBException.class, e -> "no user", directExecutor())
 *         .finishToFuture();
 * }
 *
 * In this example, when the {@code userName} {@link Future} is done, the transaction and the query
 * result cursor will both be closed, even if the operation is cancelled or fails.
 *
 * <h4>Manually closing</h4>
 *
 * If you want to close the captured objects manually, after you've used the final result, call

### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität?

Nein! Das ist nicht die Moral der Geschichte.

這與 **FastAPI** 所能提供的性能水平相同。

你可以同時利用並行性和平行性，進一步提升效能，這比大多數已測試的 NodeJS 框架都更快，並且與 Go 語言相當，而 Go 是一種更接近 C 的編譯語言（<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">感謝 Starlette</a>）。

### 並行比平行更好嗎？

不是的！這不是故事的本意。

並行與平行不同。並行在某些 **特定** 的需要大量等待的情境下表現更好。正因如此，並行在 Web 應用程式開發中通常比平行更有優勢。但並不是所有情境都如此。

因此，為了平衡報導，想像下面這個短故事

        InetAddress serverAddress = transport.getRemoteAddress().toInetAddress();

        if (isWitnessServiceAvailable(serverAddress)) {
            return serverAddress;
        }

        // Query for cluster witness service via DNS
        try {
            String clusterName = getClusterName(serverAddress);
            if (clusterName != null) {

   * by applying the given {@code AsyncFunction} to the result of the original {@code Future}.
   * Example usage:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * ListenableFuture<RowKey> rowKeyFuture = indexService.lookUp(query);
   * ListenableFuture<QueryResult> queryFuture =
   *     transformAsync(rowKeyFuture, dataService::readFuture, executor);
   * }
   *