## Typannotation vs. `Depends` { #type-annotation-vs-depends }

Beachten Sie, wie wir `CommonQueryParams` im obigen Code zweimal schreiben:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python
commons: Annotated[CommonQueryParams, Depends(CommonQueryParams)]
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.9+ nicht annotiert

/*
 * Copyright 2020 the original author or authors.
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,

     */
    public PropertyConfiguration(Properties props) throws CIFSException {
        super(false);
        initFromProperties(props);
        initDefaults(); // Use original initDefaults
    }

    /**
     * Initialize configuration from properties
     */
    private void initFromProperties(Properties props) {
        String value;

        // Standard jCIFS properties

/*
 * Copyright 2020 the original author or authors.
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,

We'd love to accept your patches! Before we can take them, we have to jump a couple of legal hurdles.

Please fill out either the individual or corporate Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

  * If you are an individual writing original source code and you're sure you own the intellectual property, then you'll need to sign an [individual CLA](https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html).

            return false;
        }
    }

    /**
     * Attempt to recover from a recoverable RDMA error
     *
     * @param connection RDMA connection to recover
     * @param error the original error
     * @return true if recovery succeeded, false otherwise
     */
    private boolean attemptRecovery(RdmaConnection connection, Exception error) {
        int retryCount = 0;

   *
   * <p>After calling this method, you may not call {@link #finishToFuture()}, {@link
   * #finishToValueAndCloser(ValueAndCloserConsumer, Executor)}, or any other derivation method on
   * the original {@code ClosingFuture} instance.
   *
   * @param function transforms the value of this step to the value of the derived step
   * @param executor executor to run the function in
   * @return the derived step

   * immutable list is returned.)
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> in almost all circumstances, the returned {@link ImmutableList} retains a
   * strong reference to {@code this}, which may prevent the original list from being garbage
   * collected. If you want the original list to be eligible for garbage collection, you should
   * create and use a copy of the sub list (e.g., {@code
   * ImmutableList.copyOf(originalList.subList(...))}).
   */
  @Override

**Application interceptors**

 * Don't need to worry about intermediate responses like redirects and retries.
 * Are always invoked once, even if the HTTP response is served from the cache.
 * Observe the application's original intent. Unconcerned with OkHttp-injected headers like `If-None-Match`.
 * Permitted to short-circuit and not call `Chain.proceed()`.
 * Permitted to retry and make multiple calls to `Chain.proceed()`.

    email = user_dict["email"],
    full_name = user_dict["full_name"],
)
```

#### Ein Pydantic-Modell aus dem Inhalt eines anderen { #a-pydantic-model-from-the-contents-of-another }

Da wir im obigen Beispiel `user_dict` von `user_in.model_dump()` bekommen haben, wäre dieser Code:

```Python
user_dict = user_in.model_dump()
UserInDB(**user_dict)
```

gleichwertig zu:

```Python