GOIOS_DEV_ID, GOIOS_TEAM_ID and GOIOS_APP_ID. The detect.go program in this directory will
attempt to auto-detect suitable values. Run it as

	go run detect.go

which will output something similar to

	export GOIOS_DEV_ID="iPhone Developer: ******@****.*** (XXXXXXXX)"
	export GOIOS_APP_ID=YYYYYYYY.some.bundle.id
	export GOIOS_TEAM_ID=ZZZZZZZZ

	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	for k, v := range ret {
		if !strings.EqualFold(k, "authorization") {
			if _, ok := dst[k]; ok {
				return fmt.Errorf("underlying %s credentials contain a %s header which is already present in the combined credentials", kind, k)
			}
			dst[k] = v
		} else {
			dst[dstHdr] = v
		}
	}
	return nil
}

type hubMembership struct {
	WorkloadIdentityPool string
}

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect.testing;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * A type which will never be used as the element type of any collection in our tests, and so can be
 * used to test how a Collection behaves when given input of the wrong type.
 */
@GwtCompatible
public enum WrongType {
  VALUE

   * equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> This method, which reencodes the input before hashing it, is useful only for
   * cross-language compatibility. For other use cases, prefer {@link #hashUnencodedChars}, which is
   * faster, produces the same output across Java releases, and hashes every {@code char} in the
   * input, even if some are invalid.
   */

   * equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> This method, which reencodes the input before hashing it, is useful only for
   * cross-language compatibility. For other use cases, prefer {@link #hashUnencodedChars}, which is
   * faster, produces the same output across Java releases, and hashes every {@code char} in the
   * input, even if some are invalid.
   */

   */
  private static final long UNEXPECTED_HANG_DELAY_MILLIS = 10000;

  /**
   * Various scenarios to be generated for each method under test. The actual scenario generation
   * (determining which scenarios are applicable to which methods and what the outcome should be)
   * takes place in {@link #addTests(TestSuite, Method)}.
   */
  private enum Scenario {
    SATISFIED_AND_UNOCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,

     Contributor and that particular Contributor’s Contribution.

1.3. “Contribution”

     means Covered Software of a particular Contributor.

1.4. “Covered Software”

     means Source Code Form to which the initial Contributor has attached the
     notice in Exhibit A, the Executable Form of such Source Code Form, and
     Modifications of such Source Code Form, in each case including portions
     thereof.

     Contributor and that particular Contributor's Contribution.

1.3. "Contribution"

     means Covered Software of a particular Contributor.

1.4. "Covered Software"

     means Source Code Form to which the initial Contributor has attached the
     notice in Exhibit A, the Executable Form of such Source Code Form, and
     Modifications of such Source Code Form, in each case including portions
     thereof.

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven;

import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenExecutionRequest;
import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenExecutionResult;

/**
 * The main Maven execution entry point, which will execute a full Maven execution session.
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.execution.MavenSession
 */
public interface Maven {
    @Deprecated
    @SuppressWarnings("checkstyle:constantname")

Only Kubernetes 1.5.0-1.5.4 installations that do all of the following:
* Enable the PodSecurityPolicy API (which is not enabled by default):
  * `--runtime-config=extensions/v1beta1/podsecuritypolicy=true`
* Enable the PodSecurityPolicy admission plugin (which is not enabled by default):
  * `--admission-control=...,PodSecurityPolicy,...`
* Use authorization to limit users' ability to use specific PodSecurityPolicy objects