) {
    responses.add(RecordedResponse(call.request(), null, null, null, e))
    (this as Object).notifyAll()
  }

  @Synchronized
  override fun onResponse(
    call: Call,
    response: Response,
  ) {
    val body = response.body.string()
    responses.add(RecordedResponse(call.request(), response, null, body, null))
    (this as Object).notifyAll()
  }

  /**

    "UndefinedEquals", // Comparisons of an object to itself *are* defined.
  })
  public void testEquals_self() {
    assertTrue("An Object should be equal to itself.", collection.equals(collection));
  }

  // Comparisons to null *are* defined.
  @SuppressWarnings("UndefinedEquals")
  public void testEquals_null() {
    // noinspection ObjectEqualsNull
    assertFalse("An object should not be equal to null.", collection.equals(null));

    if (rank == null) {
      throw new IncomparableValueException(value);
    }
    return rank;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {
    if (object instanceof ExplicitOrdering) {
      ExplicitOrdering<?> that = (ExplicitOrdering<?>) object;
      return this.rankMap.equals(that.rankMap);
    }
    return false;
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return rankMap.hashCode();

Ein `datetime`-Objekt müsste also in einen `str` umgewandelt werden, der die Daten im <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601" class="external-link" target="_blank">ISO-Format</a> enthält.

Genauso würde die Datenbank kein Pydantic-Modell (ein Objekt mit Attributen) akzeptieren, sondern nur ein `dict`.

Sie können für diese Fälle `jsonable_encoder` verwenden.

        setCreatedBy_GreaterThan(createdBy, null);
    }

    public void setCreatedBy_GreaterThan(String createdBy, ConditionOptionCall<RangeQueryBuilder> opLambda) {
        final Object _value = createdBy;
        RangeQueryBuilder builder = regRangeQ("createdBy", ConditionKey.CK_GREATER_THAN, _value);
        if (opLambda != null) {
            opLambda.callback(builder);
        }
    }

Then it would be very easy to provide a different settings object during testing by creating a dependency override for `get_settings`:

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app02/test_main.py hl[9:10,13,21] *}

In the dependency override we set a new value for the `admin_email` when creating the new `Settings` object, and then we return that new object.

Then we can test that it is used.

    }

    @Override
    protected String getItemEndpointSuffix() {
        return ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX;
    }

    @Override
    protected Map<String, Object> createTestParam(int id) {
        final Map<String, Object> requestBody = new HashMap<>();
        final String keyProp = NAME_PREFIX + id;
        requestBody.put(KEY_PROPERTY, keyProp);

    }

    @Override
    protected String getItemEndpointSuffix() {
        return ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX;
    }

    @Override
    protected Map<String, Object> createTestParam(int id) {
        final Map<String, Object> requestBody = new HashMap<>();
        final String keyProp = NAME_PREFIX + id;
        requestBody.put(KEY_PROPERTY, keyProp);
        requestBody.put("query", "query" + id);

    }

    @Override
    protected Map<String, Object> createTestParam(int id) {
        final Map<String, Object> requestBody = new HashMap<>();
        final String keyProp = NAME_PREFIX + id;
        requestBody.put(KEY_PROPERTY, keyProp);
        requestBody.put("value", Integer.valueOf(id).toString());
        return requestBody;
    }

    @Override
    protected Map<String, Object> getUpdateMap() {

    }

    @Override
    protected String getItemEndpointSuffix() {
        return ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX;
    }

    @Override
    protected Map<String, Object> createTestParam(int id) {
        final Map<String, Object> requestBody = new HashMap<>();
        final String keyProp = NAME_PREFIX + id;
        requestBody.put(KEY_PROPERTY, keyProp);
        requestBody.put("replacement", "replacement" + id);