// 256 characters long
    assertEquals(4904844928629814570L, fingerprint(Strings.repeat("test", 64).getBytes(UTF_8)));
  }

  public void testStringsConsistency() {
    for (String s : Arrays.asList("", "some", "test", "strings", "to", "try")) {
      assertEquals(HASH_FN.newHasher().putUnencodedChars(s).hash(), HASH_FN.hashUnencodedChars(s));
    }
  }

  public void testUtf8() {
    char[] charsA = new char[128];

        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

        assertArrayEquals(encryptionKey, serverData.encryptionKey);
        assertEquals("", serverData.oemDomainName);
    }

    @Test
    void testToString() {
        // Populate serverData with some values
        response.dialectIndex = 5;
        serverData.securityMode = 0x03; // User, Encrypted
        serverData.security = 1;
        serverData.encryptedPasswords = true;
        serverData.maxMpxCount = 10;

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(
                rowFunction.apply(input),

        All that, on top of all the incredible help provided by a bunch of community members, the [FastAPI Experts](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/fastapi-people/#experts), that give a lot of their time to come here and help others.

        That's a lot of work they are doing, but if more FastAPI users came to help others like them just a little bit more, it would be much less effort for them (and you and me 😅).

Classpath Exception from any of the files to which it applies and
distribute the result, you would likely be required to license some or
all of the other code in that distribution under the GPLv2 as well, and
since the GPLv2 is incompatible with the license terms of some items
included in the distribution by Oracle, removing the Classpath
Exception could therefore effectively compromise your ability to

   * the {@link Multimap} class documentation for clarification.
   */
  int size();

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if this multimap contains no key-value pairs. Equivalent to {@code size()
   * == 0}, but can in some cases be more efficient.
   */
  boolean isEmpty();

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if this multimap contains at least one key-value pair with the key {@code
   * key}.
   */

        assertTrue(BloomFilter.optimalNumOfBits(n, fpp) >= 0);
      }
    }

    // some random values
    Random random = new Random(0);
    for (int repeats = 0; repeats < 10000; repeats++) {
      assertTrue(BloomFilter.optimalNumOfBits(random.nextInt(1 << 16), random.nextDouble()) >= 0);
    }

    // and some crazy values (this used to be capped to Integer.MAX_VALUE, now it can go bigger

 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.
 *

            if (responseData == null) {
                return null;
            }

            ResultData resultData = new ResultData();
            resultData.setTransformerName(name);
            // Store some dummy data
            resultData.setData("test data".getBytes());

            return resultData;
        }

        @Override
        public Object getData(AccessResultData<?> accessResultData) {