// (https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=3254), but it's
	// still broken on our builders in 2023. Instead, append the exitcode to
	// the output and parse it from there.
	filter, exitStr := newExitCodeFilter(os.Stdout)
	args += "; echo -n " + exitStr + "$?"

	cmd := adbCmd("exec-out", args)
	cmd.Stdout = filter
	// If the adb subprocess somehow hangs, go test will kill this wrapper

Hiding your documentation user interfaces in production *shouldn't* be the way to protect your API.

That doesn't add any extra security to your API, the *path operations* will still be available where they are.

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

      description: If compiling from source
  - type: textarea
    id: what-happened
    attributes:
      label: Current behavior?
      description: Also tell us, what did you expect to happen?
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Standalone code to reproduce the issue

The generated code still has some **duplicated information**.

We already know that this method is related to the **items** because that word is in the `ItemsService` (taken from the tag), but we still have the tag name prefixed in the method name too. 😕

We will probably still want to keep it for OpenAPI in general, as that will ensure that the operation IDs are **unique**.

            assertTrue(successfulThreads.get() > 0, "At least some threads should complete successfully");

            // The rate limiter should still be functional after concurrent access
            assertTrue(concurrentLimiter.checkAttempt("finaluser", "192.168.3.1"),
                    "Rate limiter should still be functional after concurrent operations");

            // Verify that the rate limiter tracked some activity

   * response body is [closed][ResponseBody]. The recipient of the callback may consume the response
   * body on another thread.
   *
   * Note that transport-layer success (receiving a HTTP response code, headers and body) does not
   * necessarily indicate application-layer success: `response` may still indicate an unhappy HTTP
   * response code like 404 or 500.
   */

		minio/healing-rewrite-bucket/ \
		--disable-multipart --quiet

	"${WORK_DIR}/mc" cp \
		buildscripts/verify-build.sh \
		minio/healing-rewrite-bucket/ \
		--disable-multipart --quiet

	kill ${pid}
	sleep 3

	"${MINIO[@]}" --address ":$start_port" "${WORK_DIR}/xl{1...16}" >"${WORK_DIR}/server1.log" 2>&1 &
	pid=$!
	disown $pid

	"${WORK_DIR}/mc" ready minio/

	if ! ps -p ${pid} 1>&2 >/dev/null; then

```

That way, the original `APIRouter` will stay unmodified, so we can still share that same `app/internal/admin.py` file with other projects in the organization.

The result is that in our app, each of the *path operations* from the `admin` module will have:

* The prefix `/admin`.
* The tag `admin`.
* The dependency `get_token_header`.
* The response `418`. 🍵

   *
   * <p>Exceptions thrown by a listener will be propagated up to the executor. Any exception thrown
   * during {@code Executor.execute} (e.g., a {@code RejectedExecutionException} or an exception
   * thrown by {@linkplain MoreExecutors#directExecutor direct execution}) will be caught and
   * logged.
   *
   * <p>Note: If your listener is lightweight -- and will not cause stack overflow by completing

    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return first element after peeking", "A", peekingIterator.next());

    assertEquals("Should be able to peek() at middle element", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "Should be able to peek() middle element multiple times", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return middle element after peeking", "B", peekingIterator.next());