Não se preocupe, com a forma como o código está estruturado, garantiremos que usamos **uma única *sessão* SQLModel por requisição** mais tarde, isso é realmente o que o `check_same_thread` está tentando conseguir.

### Criar as Tabelas { #create-the-tables }

            });
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    Thread thread =
        new Thread(
            new Runnable() {
              @Override
              public void run() {
                try {
                  task.run();
                } finally {
                  exitLatch.countDown();
                }
              }
            });
    thread.start();
    enterLatch.await();

 * <p>
 * <strong>Thread-Safety:</strong> This class is <strong>NOT thread-safe</strong>.
 * It extends {@link LinkedHashMap} without synchronization. If multiple threads access
 * an instance concurrently, and at least one thread modifies the map structurally,
 * it must be synchronized externally.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * For thread-safe usage, wrap with {@link java.util.Collections#synchronizedMap(Map)}:

    assertFalse(future.isDone());
    assertFalse(future.isCancelled());

    CountDownLatch successLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);

    // Run cancellation in a separate thread as an extra thread-safety test.
    new Thread(
            () -> {
              assertThrows(CancellationException.class, future::get);
              successLatch.countDown();
            })
        .start();

              @Override
              public Integer call() {
                return Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace().length;
              }
            },
            directExecutor());
    settableFuture.set(null);
    assertThat(getDone(stackDepthCheck))
        .isLessThan(Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace().length + 100);
  }

        logger.log(
            Level.INFO, "Failed to create a thread without inherited thread-local values", t);
      }
    }
    if (thread == null) {
      thread = new Thread((ThreadGroup) null, finalizer, threadName);
    }
    thread.setDaemon(true);

    try {
      if (inheritableThreadLocals != null) {
        inheritableThreadLocals.set(thread, null);
      }
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      logger.log(

    assertFalse(future.isDone());
    assertFalse(future.isCancelled());

    CountDownLatch successLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);

    // Run cancellation in a separate thread as an extra thread-safety test.
    new Thread(
            () -> {
              assertThrows(CancellationException.class, future::get);
              successLatch.countDown();
            })
        .start();

        .connectionPool(ConnectionPool(connectionListener = connectionListener))
    }

  private fun loomThreadFactory(): ThreadFactory {
    val ofVirtual = Thread::class.java.getMethod("ofVirtual").invoke(null)

    return Class
      .forName("java.lang.Thread\$Builder")
      .getMethod("factory")
      .invoke(ofVirtual) as ThreadFactory
  }

                }
            }).start();
        }

        // Signal all threads to start at once
        startLatch.countDown();

        // Wait for all threads to complete
        assertTrue("Threads did not complete in time", doneLatch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS));

        // All threads should fail with the same IOException (endpoint is blank)

 * thread) the subscriber is actually called when an event is dispatched to it.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
abstract class Dispatcher {

  /**
   * Returns a dispatcher that queues events that are posted reentrantly on a thread that is already
   * dispatching an event, guaranteeing that all events posted on a single thread are dispatched to