* <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems
 * reasonable and it will be fine.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If checking whether the <i>caller</i> has violated your method or constructor's contract

    list.set(0, (char) 4);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new char[] {(char) 0, (char) 1, (char) 2});
    newArray[1] = (char) 5;
    assertThat((char) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((char) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    char[] array = {(char) 0, (char) 1, (char) 2, (char) 3};
    List<Character> list = Chars.asList(array);

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

    list.set(0, 4.0);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new double[] {0.0, 1.0, 2.0});
    newArray[1] = 5.0;
    assertThat((double) list.get(1)).isEqualTo(1.0);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    double[] array = {0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
    List<Double> list = Doubles.asList(array);

		if cr.debug {
			fmt.Printf("prefix, want prefix %q, got %q", "x-amz-trailer-signature:", string(sig))
		}
		return errMalformedEncoding
	}

	// TODO: It seems like we may have to be prepared to rewrite and sort trailing headers:
	// https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/create-signed-request.html

	// Any value must end with a newline.
	// Not all clients send that.

    list.set(0, (int) 4);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new int[] {(int) 0, (int) 1, (int) 2});
    newArray[1] = (int) 5;
    assertThat((int) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((int) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    int[] array = {(int) 0, (int) 1, (int) 2, (int) 3};
    List<Integer> list = Ints.asList(array);

            .build();

    RangeMap<Integer, Integer> copy = TreeRangeMap.copyOf(rangeMap);

    assertEquals(rangeMap.asMapOfRanges(), copy.asMapOfRanges());
  }

  // Overriding testEquals because it seems that we get spurious failures when it things empty
  // should be unequal to empty.
  public void testEquals() {
    TreeRangeMap<Integer, Integer> empty = TreeRangeMap.create();

   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper, which would fail with a similar problem to
   * VarHandleAtomicHelperMaker, forcing us all the way to SynchronizedHelper.
   *
   * Additionally, it seems that nestmates do not help with runtime reflection under *Android*, even
   * when we use a newer -source and -target. That doesn't normally matter for AbstractFutureState,

        }
        try {
            final String authDomain = tf.getCredentials().getUserDomain();
            // otherwise you end up with a wrong server name for kerberos
            // seems to be correct according to
            // https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-August/066486.html
            // UniAddress addr = UniAddress.getByName(authDomain, true, tf);