* more information, see the comments in that class.
       *
       * We already know that that's how it behaves, and subclasses of Converter can't change that
       * behavior. So there's no sense in making all subclass authors exclude the method from any
       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

    for (int i = 0; i < nSeededEntries; i++) {
      assertEquals("b" + i, removalNotifications.get("b" + i));
    }

    // Each of the values added to the map should either still be there, or have seen a removal
    // notification.
    assertEquals(expectedKeys, Sets.union(cache.asMap().keySet(), removalNotifications.keySet()));
    assertTrue(Sets.intersection(cache.asMap().keySet(), removalNotifications.keySet()).isEmpty());

    for (int i = 0; i < nSeededEntries; i++) {
      assertEquals("b" + i, removalNotifications.get("b" + i));
    }

    // Each of the values added to the map should either still be there, or have seen a removal
    // notification.
    assertEquals(expectedKeys, Sets.union(cache.asMap().keySet(), removalNotifications.keySet()));
    assertTrue(Sets.intersection(cache.asMap().keySet(), removalNotifications.keySet()).isEmpty());

   * use with getUnchecked. Further, it's not clear that converting the checked TimeoutException to
   * a RuntimeException -- especially to an UncheckedExecutionException, since it wasn't thrown by
   * the computation -- makes sense, and if we don't convert it, the user still has to write a
   * try-catch block.
   *
   * If you think you would use this method, let us know. You might also look into the

 * supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

    return ImmutableList.copyOf(SORTED_NUMBER_NAMES.subList(i, j));
  }

  private static final ImmutableList<String> NUMBER_NAMES =
      ImmutableList.of("one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven");

  private static final ImmutableList<String> SORTED_NUMBER_NAMES =
      Ordering.<String>natural().immutableSortedCopy(NUMBER_NAMES);

kawara.fukuoka.jp
kawasaki.miyagi.jp
kawatana.nagasaki.jp
kawaue.gifu.jp
kawazu.shizuoka.jp
kayabe.hokkaido.jp
kazimierz-dolny.pl
kazo.saitama.jp
kazuno.akita.jp
kddi
ke
keisen.fukuoka.jp
keliweb.cloud
kembuchi.hokkaido.jp
kep.tr
kepno.pl
kerryhotels
kerrylogistics
kerryproperties
ketrzyn.pl
keymachine.de
keyword-on.net
kfh
kg
kg.kr

     */
    private static <K, V> Entry<K, V> @Nullable [] lastEntryForEachKey(
        Entry<K, V>[] entries, int size) {
      Set<K> seen = new HashSet<>();
      BitSet dups = new BitSet(); // slots that are overridden by a later duplicate key
      for (int i = size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        if (!seen.add(entries[i].getKey())) {
          dups.set(i);
        }
      }
      if (dups.isEmpty()) {
        return null;

     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *
     * - a call that consults a chain of maps, as in `mapA.getOrDefault(key, mapB.getOrDefault(key,
     *   ...))`
     *
     * So it makes sense for the parameter (and thus the return type) to be @Nullable.
     *
     * Two other points:
     *
     * 1. We'll want to use something like @PolyNull once we can make that work for the various