iterator.hasNext());
    iterator.remove();
    assertTrue(
        "multiset isn't empty after multiset.entrySet() iterator.remove()",
        getMultiset().isEmpty());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testEntrySet_removePresent() {
    assertTrue(
        "multiset.entrySet.remove(presentEntry) returned false",

   * removeFrom.removeIf(predicate)} instead.
   *
   * @param removeFrom the iterable to (potentially) remove elements from
   * @param predicate a predicate that determines whether an element should be removed
   * @return {@code true} if any elements were removed from the iterable
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if the iterable does not support {@code remove()}.
   * @since 2.0
   */

  }

  /**
   * A sensible definition of {@link #remove(Object)} in terms of {@link #remove(Object, int)}. If
   * you override {@link #remove(Object, int)}, you may wish to override {@link #remove(Object)} to
   * forward to this implementation.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  @Override
  protected boolean standardRemove(@Nullable Object element) {
    return remove(element, 1) > 0;
  }

  /**

    }
  }

  /**
   * A sensible definition of {@link #poll} in terms of {@link #remove}. If you override {@link
   * #remove}, you may wish to override {@link #poll} to forward to this implementation.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  protected @Nullable E standardPoll() {
    try {
      return remove();
    } catch (NoSuchElementException caught) {
      return null;
    }
  }

    /* Should complain on attempt to remove() after peek(). */
    assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> peekingIterator.remove());

    assertEquals(
        "After remove() throws exception, peek should still be ok", "B", peekingIterator.peek());

    /* Should recover to be able to remove() after next(). */
    assertEquals("B", peekingIterator.next());
    peekingIterator.remove();

        }

        // Remove state for old versions of Gradle that we're unlikely to ever require again
        fileSystemOperations.removeOldVersionsFromDir(workerDir.dir("caches"), expireDistributionCache)

        // Remove scripts caches
        fileSystemOperations.removeCachedScripts(workerDir.dir("caches").asFile)

        // Remove script caches from TestKit integTest temp dir

      return delegate.poll();
    }

    @Override
    public E remove() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.remove();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean remove(Object object) {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.remove(object);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E peek() {

 *
 * <p>For instance, if <i>steps</i> is 5, one example sequence that will be tested is:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive

  }

  /**
   * A sensible, albeit inefficient, definition of {@link #remove} in terms of the {@code iterator}
   * method of {@link #entrySet}. If you override {@link #entrySet}, you may wish to override {@link
   * #remove} to forward to this implementation.
   *
   * <p>Alternately, you may wish to override {@link #remove} with {@code keySet().remove}, assuming
   * that approach would not lead to an infinite loop.
   *

        recurse(level + 1);
      }
    }
  }

  private void compareResultsForThisListOfStimuli() {
    int removes = frequency(asList(stimuli), remove);
    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively