+-----+
${maven.home}
     |
     +--- maven.properties
+-----+

* Group configuration

 As far as properties go for an entire build the maven.properties could be placed at
 the top of the group but I'm not really sure how this might work. There could probably
 also be a directory for plugins.xml and maven.properties.

* Project configuration

 *
 * <p>Tests should inherit from this class, and declare subtyping relationship with public methods
 * annotated by {@link TestSubtype}.
 *
 * <p>These declaration methods rely on Java static type checking to make sure what we want to
 * assert as subtypes are really subtypes according to javac. For example:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * class MySubtypeTests extends SubtypeTester {
 *   @TestSubtype(suppressGetSubtype = true, suppressGetSupertype = true)

      }

      /*
       * We use this only when getTypeName is available.
       *
       * Well, really, we use this when we think we're running under Java 8, as determined by some
       * logic in the static initializer, which does not check for getTypeName specifically. We
       * should really validate that it works as desired for all Android versions that we support.
       */
      @IgnoreJRERequirement

    private static final byte[] APPLABEL_300 = toCBytes("SMB2APP");
    private static final byte[] APPLABEL_311 = toCBytes("SMBAppKey");

    private static final byte[] ENCCONTEXT_300 = toCBytes("ServerIn "); // there really is a space there
    private static final byte[] ENCLABEL_300 = toCBytes("SMB2AESCCM");
    private static final byte[] ENCLABEL_311 = toCBytes("SMB2C2SCipherKey");

            is9x = (actualOsName.contains("95")
                    || actualOsName.contains("98")
                    || actualOsName.contains("me")
                    // wince isn't really 9x, but crippled enough to
                    // be a muchness. Maven doesnt run on CE, anyway.
                    || actualOsName.contains("ce"));
            isNT = !is9x;
        }
        return switch (family) {

# Background Tasks { #background-tasks }

You can define background tasks to be run *after* returning a response.

This is useful for operations that need to happen after a request, but that the client doesn't really have to be waiting for the operation to complete before receiving the response.

This includes, for example:

* Email notifications sent after performing an action:

                "input": '{"name": "Foo", "price": 50.5}',
            }
        ]
    }

    response = client.post(
        "/items/", content=data, headers={"Content-Type": "application/not-really-json"}
    )
    assert response.status_code == 422, response.text
    assert response.json() == {
        "detail": [
            {
                "type": "model_attributes_type",

  `We called him Tortoise because he taught us,' said the Mock
Turtle angrily:  `really you are very dull!'

  `You ought to be ashamed of yourself for asking such a simple
question,' added the Gryphon; and then they both sat silent and
looked at poor Alice, who felt ready to sink into the earth.  At
last the Gryphon said to the Mock Turtle, `Drive on, old fellow!

      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

 * test with reference to the same "lock-like object", and then their interactions with that object
 * are choreographed via the various methods on this class.
 *
 * <p>A "lock-like object" is really any object that may be used for concurrency control. If the
 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a