filter := func() (commonCount uint64) {
		max := 0
		signatureMap := map[uint64]int{}
		for _, info := range infos {
			if info.Error != "" {
				continue
			}
			mutations := info.Metrics.TotalDeletes + info.Metrics.TotalWrites
			signatureMap[mutations]++
		}
		for ops, count := range signatureMap {
			if max < count && commonCount < ops {
				max = count
				commonCount = ops
			}
		}
		if max < readQuorum {

    /**
     * This default mode for combining children DOMs during merge means that where element names match, the process will
     * try to merge the element data, rather than putting the dominant and recessive elements (which share the same
     * element name) as siblings in the resulting DOM.
     */
    String DEFAULT_CHILDREN_COMBINATION_MODE = CHILDREN_COMBINATION_MERGE;

		},
	}

	// Iterating over the cases, fetching the object validating the response.
	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		// initialize HTTP NewRecorder, this records any mutations to response writer inside the handler.
		rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
		// construct HTTP request for Get Object end point.

    // There are several well-known algorithms for rotating part of an array (or, equivalently,
    // exchanging two blocks of memory). This classic text by Gries and Mills mentions several:
    // https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/6292/81-452.pdf.
    // (1) "Reversal", the one we have here.
    // (2) "Dolphin". If we're rotating an array a of size n by a distance of d, then element a[0]

   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
    it, and giving a relevant date.

    b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
    released under this License and any conditions added under section
    7.  This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to

	// Writes to f are only synchronized once Close() is called,
	// or when files are being rotated.
	f *os.File

	pw *xioutil.PipeWriter
	pr *xioutil.PipeReader
}

// Write writes p into the current file, rotating if necessary.
// Write is non-blocking, if the writer's queue is not full.
// Write is blocking otherwise.
func (w *Writer) Write(p []byte) (n int, err error) {
	return w.pw.Write(p)
}

// Close closes the writer.

/**
 * Standard implementation of {@link MutableNetwork} that supports both directed and undirected
 * graphs. Instances of this class should be constructed with {@link NetworkBuilder}.
 *
 * <p>Time complexities for mutation methods are all O(1) except for {@code removeNode(N node)},
 * which is in O(d_node) where d_node is the degree of {@code node}.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @author Joshua O'Madadhain
 * @author Omar Darwish

   * insertion order.
   */
  private void populateTShapedGraph() {
    putEdge(2, 1);
    putEdge(1, 4);
    putEdge(1, 3);
    putEdge(1, 2); // Duplicate
    putEdge(4, 5);
  }

  // Element Mutation

  @Test
  public void putEdge_existingNodes() {
    assume().that(graphIsMutable()).isTrue();

    // Adding nodes initially for safety (insulating from possible future
    // modifications to proxy methods)