if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }
    return -1;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the least value present in {@code array}, using the same rules of comparison as {@link
   * Math#min(double, double)}.
   *
   * @param array a <i>nonempty</i> array of {@code double} values
   * @return the value present in {@code array} that is less than or equal to every other value in

        p1 = path1.lastIndexOf('/');
        p2 = path2.lastIndexOf('/');
        l1 = path1.length() - p1;
        l2 = path2.length() - p2;

        // anything with dots voids comparison
        if ((l1 > 1 && path1.charAt(p1 + 1) == '.') || (l2 > 1 && path2.charAt(p2 + 1) == '.')) {
            return true;
        }

        return l1 == l2 && path1.regionMatches(true, p1, path2, p2, l1);
    }

			t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected the result to `%v`, but instead got `%v`", i+1, testCase.expectedResult, actualResult)
		}
	}
}

// TestIsValidRegion - Tests validate the comparison logic for asserting whether the region from http request is valid.
func TestIsValidRegion(t *testing.T) {
	testCases := []struct {
		inputReqRegion  string
		inputConfRegion string

		expectedResult bool
	}{

            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_EXECUTE < ACE.GENERIC_WRITE, "GENERIC_EXECUTE should be less than GENERIC_WRITE");
            // Note: GENERIC_READ (0x80000000) is negative, so it's less than positive values in signed comparison
            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_WRITE > 0 && ACE.GENERIC_READ < 0, "GENERIC_WRITE is positive, GENERIC_READ is negative");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should validate constant bit ranges")

 *
 * // In case bug 12345 happens again we'd rather just die
 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems

         *
         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against
         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that
         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *

   * left.equals(right)} instead of this method.
   *
   * @param left the map to treat as the "left" map for purposes of comparison
   * @param right the map to treat as the "right" map for purposes of comparison
   * @return the difference between the two maps
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      MapDifference<K, V> difference(

   * left.equals(right)} instead of this method.
   *
   * @param left the map to treat as the "left" map for purposes of comparison
   * @param right the map to treat as the "right" map for purposes of comparison
   * @return the difference between the two maps
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      MapDifference<K, V> difference(

  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node

     * {@code " x "} (space, letter x, space), followed by the count.
     */
    @Override
    String toString();
  }

  // Comparison and hashing

  /**
   * Compares the specified object with this multiset for equality. Returns {@code true} if the
   * given object is also a multiset and contains equal elements with equal counts, regardless of