reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Shorts.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(short[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Bytes.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(byte[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

     * file attributes such as ACLs but it does copy regular attributes as
     * well as create and last write times. This method is almost twice as
     * efficient as manually copying as it employs an additional write
     * thread to read and write data concurrently.
     * <br>
     * It is not possible (nor meaningful) to copy entire workgroups or
     * servers.
     *

Blocking APIs may be inefficient because you hold a thread idle while waiting on the network. Threads are expensive because they have both a memory overhead and a context-switching overhead.

#### Framed protocols

 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*

 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*

   *
   * While intuitively, using CharsetEncoder to encode the CharSequence directly to the buffer (or
   * even to an intermediate buffer) should be considerably more efficient than potentially
   * copying the CharSequence to a String and then calling getBytes(Charset) on that String, in
   * reality there are optimizations that make the getBytes(Charset) approach considerably faster,

     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple
      // elements already available (e.g. LinkedBlockingQueue#drainTo locks only once)
      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);

  }

  /*
   * Not subclassing AbstractMultiset$MultisetIterator because next() needs to
   * retrieve the Map.Entry<E, Count> entry, which can then be used for
   * a more efficient remove() call.
   */
  private class MapBasedMultisetIterator implements Iterator<E> {
    final Iterator<Map.Entry<E, Count>> entryIterator;
    @CheckForNull Map.Entry<E, Count> currentEntry;
    int occurrencesLeft;

 * this class rather than implement {@link Network} directly.
 *
 * <p>The methods implemented in this class should not be overridden unless the subclass admits a
 * more efficient implementation.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type
 * @since 20.0
 */
@Beta
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault