* during {@code Executor.execute} (e.g., a {@code RejectedExecutionException} or an exception
   * thrown by {@linkplain MoreExecutors#directExecutor direct execution}) will be caught and
   * logged.
   *
   * <p>Note: If your listener is lightweight -- and will not cause stack overflow by completing
   * more futures or adding more {@code directExecutor()} listeners inline -- consider {@link

     * middle of defining a class. If so, that class will never be loadable in this process.) The
     * best we can do (since logging may overflow the stack) is to let the error propagate. Because
     * it is an Error, it won't be caught and logged by AbstractFuture.executeListener. Instead, it
     * can propagate through many layers of AbstractTransformFuture up to the root call to set().
     *
     * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2254
     *

	if in.peek {
		in.peek = false
		tok := in.peekToken
		in.text = in.peekText
		return tok
	}
	// If we cannot generate a token after 100 macro invocations, we're in trouble.
	// The usual case is caught by Push, below, but be safe.
	for nesting := 0; nesting < 100; {
		tok := in.Stack.Next()
		switch tok {
		case '#':
			if !in.beginningOfLine {
				in.Error("'#' must be first item on line")
			}

     * middle of defining a class. If so, that class will never be loadable in this process.) The
     * best we can do (since logging may overflow the stack) is to let the error propagate. Because
     * it is an Error, it won't be caught and logged by AbstractFuture.executeListener. Instead, it
     * can propagate through many layers of AbstractTransformFuture up to the root call to set().
     *
     * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2254
     *

  interface ItemReporter {
    String reportItem(Item<?> item);
  }

  /**
   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableLongArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableLongArray iia = ImmutableLongArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia.subArray(0, 3));

An additional header `X-Minio-Replication-Delete-Status` is returned which would show `PENDING` or `FAILED` status if the replication is still not caught up.

The `okhttp3.internal` package is not a published API and we change it frequently without warning.
Depending on code in this package is bad and will cause you problems with any upgrade! But the 4.x
will be particularly painful to naughty developers that import from this package! We changed a lot
to take advantage of sweet Kotlin features.

#### Credentials.basic()

            return running;
        }

        /**
         * Waits for the crawling thread to terminate.
         * This method blocks until the thread completes its execution.
         * Interrupted exceptions are caught and logged at debug level.
         */
        public void awaitTermination() {
            try {
                join();
            } catch (final InterruptedException e) {

  interface ItemReporter {
    String reportItem(Item<?> item);
  }

  /**
   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,