}
    }

    public ArtifactVersion matchVersion(List<ArtifactVersion> versions) {
        // TODO could be more efficient by sorting the list and then moving along the restrictions in order?

        ArtifactVersion matched = null;
        for (ArtifactVersion version : versions) {
            if (containsVersion(version)) {
                // valid - check if it is greater than the currently matched version

        out.println("<b><a class=\"plain\" href=\".\">normal</a> | <a class=\"plain\" href=\"?fmt=detail\">detailed</a></b>");
        out.println("<p><table border='0' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td>");

        out.print("<A style=\"width: " + maxLen);
        out.print("; height: 18;\" HREF=\"");
        out.print(path);
        out.println("\"><b>&uarr;</b></a>");

                    appendJson("doc-id", entity.getDocId(), buf).append(',');
                    appendJson("url", entity.getUrl(), buf).append(',');
                    appendJson("order", entity.getOrder(), buf).append(',');
                    appendJson("query-requested-at", entity.getQueryRequestedAt(), buf).append(',');
                    appendJson("requested-at", entity.getRequestedAt(), buf);

     */
    @Nonnull
    Version resolveVersion(@Nonnull ArtifactCoordinates artifact) throws VersionResolverException;

    /**
     * Expands a version range to a list of matching versions, in ascending order.
     * For example, resolves "[3.8,4.0)" to "3.8", "3.8.1", "3.8.2".
     * The returned list of versions is only dependent on the configured repositories and their contents.

## Known Issues

        TestAbstractRule rule3 = new TestAbstractRule();
        rule3.crawlerContainer = container;
        rule3.setRuleId("rule3");
        rule3.setMatchResult(false);

        // Register in order
        rule1.register(0);
        rule2.register(1);
        rule3.register(2);

        // Get matching rule
        ResponseData responseData = new ResponseData();

        // have been resolved.
        if (request.isResolveRoot()) {
            // Add the root artifact (as the first artifact to retain logical order of class path!)
            Set<Artifact> allArtifacts = new LinkedHashSet<>();
            allArtifacts.add(rootArtifact);
            allArtifacts.addAll(result.getArtifacts());
            result.setArtifacts(allArtifacts);

        out.println("<b><a class=\"plain\" href=\".\">normal</a> | <a class=\"plain\" href=\"?fmt=detail\">detailed</a></b>");
        out.println("<p><table border='0' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td>");

        out.print("<A style=\"width: " + maxLen);
        out.print("; height: 18;\" HREF=\"");
        out.print(path);
        out.println("\"><b>&uarr;</b></a>");

   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */

        }
    }
    
    // Fall back to TCP
    return new SmbTransport(context, address.getAddress(), address.getPort());
}

private RdmaProvider selectRdmaProvider() {
    // Try providers in order of preference
    List<RdmaProvider> providers = Arrays.asList(
        new DisniRdmaProvider(),      // InfiniBand/RoCE
        new JxioRdmaProvider(),       // Alternative RDMA library