public boolean usesFastPath() {
      return true;
    }

    /*
     * non-private so that our `-source 8` build doesn't need to generate a synthetic accessor
     * method, whose mention of VarHandle would upset WriteReplaceOverridesTest under Java 8.
     */
    static final VarHandle HANDLE = byteArrayViewVarHandle(long[].class, LITTLE_ENDIAN);
  }

  /**

are skipped, and any checks implemented inside the shape inference code are not
executed.

The security impact of skipping those checks should be low, since the attack
scenario would require a malicious user to be able to control the model which as
stated above is already equivalent to code execution. In any case, the
recommendation is not to serve models using Eager mode since it also has

      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

}

// Wrapper to restClient.CallWithMethod to handle network errors, in case of network error the connection is disconnected
// and a healthcheck routine gets invoked that would reconnect.
func (client *storageRESTClient) callGet(ctx context.Context, rpcMethod string, values url.Values, body io.Reader, length int64) (io.ReadCloser, error) {
	if values == nil {
		values = make(url.Values)
	}

      // e.g. a certificate pinning error.
      return false
    }
    // An example of one we might want to retry with a different route is a problem connecting to a
    // proxy and would manifest as a standard IOException. Unless it is one we know we should not
    // retry, we return true and try a new route.
    return true
  }

  /**

        assertEquals(0, response.readSetupWireFormat(emptyBuffer, 0, 0));
        assertEquals(0, response.readDataWireFormat(emptyBuffer, 0, 0));

        // readParametersWireFormat would throw exception due to buffer underflow
        assertThrows(Exception.class, () -> {
            response.readParametersWireFormat(emptyBuffer, 0, 0);
        });
    }

    @Test

   *   <li>{@code ImmutableList.of(2, "C")}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>The result is guaranteed to be in the "traditional", lexicographical order for Cartesian
   * products that you would get from nesting for loops:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * for (B b0 : lists.get(0)) {
   *   for (B b1 : lists.get(1)) {
   *     ...
   *     ImmutableList<B> tuple = ImmutableList.of(b0, b1, ...);

/**
 * Base class for services that can implement {@link #startUp}, {@link #run} and {@link #shutDown}
 * methods. This class uses a single thread to execute the service; consider {@link AbstractService}
 * if you would like to manage any threading manually.
 *
 * @author Jesse Wilson
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
public abstract class AbstractExecutionThreadService implements Service {

 * descriptor ACEs:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Allow WNET\alice     0x001200A9  Direct
 * Allow Administrators 0x001F01FF  Inherited
 * Allow SYSTEM         0x001F01FF  Inherited
 * </pre>
 *
 * the access check would fail because the direct ACE has an access mask
 * of <code>0x001200A9</code> which doesn't have the
 * <code>FILE_WRITE_DATA</code> bit on (bit <code>0x00000002</code>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If

			"#define A",
			"#ifdef A",
			"#ifdef B",
			"#define C 1234",
			"#else",
			"#define C 5678",
			"#endif",
			"#endif",
			"C",
		),
		"5678.\n",
	},
	{
		"nested not-taken/would-be-taken #ifdef",
		lines(
			"#define B",
			"#ifdef A",
			"#ifdef B",
			"#define C 1234",
			"#else",
			"#define C 5678",
			"#endif",
			"#endif",
			"C",
		),
		"C.\n",
	},