```sh
npx @hey-api/openapi-ts -i ./openapi.json -o src/client
```

Después de generar el nuevo cliente, ahora tendrías nombres de métodos **limpios**, con todo el **autocompletado**, **errores en línea**, etc:

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image08.png">

## Beneficios { #benefits }

        if (requestHeaderPager.id != null) {
            cb.query().docMeta().setId_Equal(requestHeaderPager.id);
        }
        // TODO Long, Integer, String supported only.

        // setup condition
        cb.query().addOrderBy_Name_Asc();

        // search

    }

    /**

    }
}

// https://github.com/gradle/gradle-private/issues/4527
// https://github.com/gradle/gradle-private/issues/4528
// Trigger ReadyForNightly and ReadyForRelease for provider-api-migration/public-api-changes branch
// TODO: remove this after the branch is merged
const val PROVIDER_API_MIGRATION_BRANCH = "gradle10/provider-api-migration"
const val BOT_DAILY_UPGRADLE_WRAPPER_BRANCH = "devprod/upgrade-to-latest-wrapper"

import java.nio.charset.Charset;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;

/**
 * Opinionated plugin that generates the release notes for a Gradle release.
 *
 * TODO: Maybe eventually convert this asciidoc too, so everything uses the same markup language.
 */
public class GradleReleaseNotesPlugin implements Plugin<Project> {
    @Override
    public void apply(Project project) {

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
@NullUnmarked
public final class GraphEquivalenceTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;

   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"nullness", "unchecked"})

   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"nullness", "unchecked"})

 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class ForwardingMapEntry<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends ForwardingObject implements Map.Entry<K, V> {
  // TODO(lowasser): identify places where thread safety is actually lost

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ForwardingMapEntry() {}

  @Override
  protected abstract Entry<K, V> delegate();

 * class.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
class StandardRowSortedTable<R, C, V> extends StandardTable<R, C, V>
    implements RowSortedTable<R, C, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(jlevy): Consider adding headTable, tailTable, and subTable methods,
   * which return a Table view with rows keys in a given range. Create a
   * RowSortedTable subinterface with the revised methods?
   */

            throws ArtifactDeploymentException {
        if (artifact.isSnapshot()) {
            Snapshot snapshot = new Snapshot();

            // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
            snapshot.setTimestamp(getDeploymentTimestamp());

            // we update the build number anyway so that it doesn't get lost. It requires the timestamp to take effect