SMBUtil.writeInt4(10, buffer, bodyStart + 4);
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(0, buffer, bodyStart + 8);
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(reserved2Value, buffer, bodyStart + 12); // Reserved2

        // Write some test data
        Arrays.fill(buffer, dataOffsetFromHeader, dataOffsetFromHeader + 10, (byte) 0x55);

        // Use reflection to set headerStart

     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>
     * and Equivalence<Object>.
     */
    private final Equivalence<? super @NonNull T> equivalence;

    @ParametricNullness private final T reference;

 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"

          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <required>true</required>
          <description>
            <![CDATA[
            The local repository.<br><b>Default value is:</b> {@code ${user.home}/.m2/repository}
            ]]>
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>interactiveMode</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

* Fix a typo in prometheus-to-sd configuration, that drops some stackdriver metrics. ([#56473](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56473), [@loburm](https://github.com/loburm))

  - [Changelog since v1.20.5](#changelog-since-v1205)
  - [Important Security Information](#important-security-information-1)
    - [CVE-2021-25735: Validating Admission Webhook does not observe some previous fields](#cve-2021-25735-validating-admission-webhook-does-not-observe-some-previous-fields)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind-9)
    - [API Change](#api-change-2)
    - [Feature](#feature-5)
    - [Bug or Regression](#bug-or-regression-9)

 *             return createExpensiveGraph(key);
 *           }
 *         });
 * }
 *
 * <p>Or equivalently,
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * // In real life this would come from a command-line flag or config file
 * String spec = "maximumSize=10000,expireAfterWrite=10m";
 *
 * LoadingCache<Key, Graph> graphs = CacheBuilder.from(spec)
 *     .removalListener(MY_LISTENER)
 *     .build(

            Queue<String> errors = (Queue<String>) errorsField.get(null);
            errors.clear();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            // Ignore if field doesn't exist
        }

        // Add some errors to the queue
        Crawler.addError("Error 1");
        Crawler.addError("Error 2");

        // Create a mock crawlingInfoHelper that tracks status updates

 * constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash function doing a
 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},

    return accessibleObject.getDeclaredAnnotations();
  }

  // We ought to be able to implement GenericDeclaration instead its parent AnnotatedElement.
  // That would give us this method declaration. But for some reason, implementing
  // GenericDeclaration leads to weird errors in Android tests:
  // IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface not implemented
  /** See {@link java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration#getTypeParameters()}. */