// Test default constructor
        AggregateLogJob job = new AggregateLogJob();
        assertNotNull(job);
    }

    public void test_execute_success() {
        // Setup mock SearchLogHelper that succeeds
        SearchLogHelper mockSearchLogHelper = new SearchLogHelper() {
            @Override
            public void storeSearchLog() {
                // Successful execution - no exception thrown
            }

  private EscaperAsserts() {}

  /**
   * Asserts that an escaper behaves correctly with respect to null inputs.
   *
   * @param escaper the non-null escaper to test
   */
  public static void assertBasic(Escaper escaper) throws IOException {
    // Escapers operate on characters: no characters, no escaping.
    Assert.assertEquals("", escaper.escape(""));
    // Assert that escapers throw null pointer exceptions.
    try {

  private EscaperAsserts() {}

  /**
   * Asserts that an escaper behaves correctly with respect to null inputs.
   *
   * @param escaper the non-null escaper to test
   */
  public static void assertBasic(Escaper escaper) throws IOException {
    // Escapers operate on characters: no characters, no escaping.
    Assert.assertEquals("", escaper.escape(""));
    // Assert that escapers throw null pointer exceptions.
    try {

              // We can't have a GOLDEN_NOT_PRESENT_KEY because false positives are
              // possible! It's false negatives that can't happen.
              assertThat(bloomFilter.mightContain(GOLDEN_PRESENT_KEY)).isTrue();

              int key = getNonGoldenRandomKey();
              // We can't check that the key is mightContain() == false before the
              // put() because the key could have already been generated *or* the

    }

    public void test_oneWayCryptography() {
        // Test that one-way cryptographer is available
        OneWayCryptographer cryptographer = securityResourceProvider.providePrimaryOneWayCryptographer();
        assertNotNull(cryptographer);
    }

    public void test_oneWayCryptography_consistency() {
        // Test that same cryptographer instance is returned

                        && Objects.equals(groupId, that.groupId)
                        && Objects.equals(artifactId, that.artifactId)
                        && Objects.equals(version, that.version)
                        && Objects.equals(classifier, that.classifier)
                        && Objects.equals(extension, that.extension)

But when you declare them with Python types (in the example above, as `int`), they are converted to that type and validated against it.

All the same process that applied for path parameters also applies for query parameters:

* Editor support (obviously)
* Data <abbr title="converting the string that comes from an HTTP request into Python data">"parsing"</abbr>
* Data validation
* Automatic documentation

        return pageNumberList;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the search query string that was used to generate these results.
     *
     * @return the search query string
     */
    public String getSearchQuery() {
        return searchQuery;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the search query string that was used to generate these results.
     *
     * @param searchQuery the search query string
     */

When you PUT an object in a versioning-enabled bucket, the noncurrent version is not overwritten. The following figure shows that when a new version of `spark.csv` is PUT into a bucket that already contains an object with the same name, the original object (ID = `ede336f2`) remains in the bucket, MinIO generates a new version (ID = `fae684da`), and adds the newer version to the bucket.

**Standalone code to reproduce the issue**
Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate
the problem. If possible, please share a link to or attach code demonstrating
the problem.

**Any other info / logs**
Include any logs or source code that would be helpful to diagnose the problem.
If including tracebacks, please include the full traceback. Large logs and files