func objectPartIndexNums(parts []int, partNumber int) int {
	for i, part := range parts {
		if part != 0 && partNumber == part {
			return i
		}
	}
	return -1
}

// AddObjectPart - add a new object part in order.
func (fi *FileInfo) AddObjectPart(partNumber int, partETag string, partSize, actualSize int64, modTime time.Time, idx []byte, checksums map[string]string) {
	partInfo := ObjectPartInfo{
		Number:     partNumber,

   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet
   *     other type variables, in which case these type variables will be further resolved if

   *
   * <p>Whenever possible, it is preferable to test directly for some observable change resulting
   * from GC, as with {@link #awaitClear}. Because there are no guarantees for the order of GC
   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.
   *
   * <p>This method does not create any memory pressure as would be required to cause soft

  }

  /**
   * Searches the specified list for the specified object using the binary search algorithm. The
   * list must be sorted into ascending order according to the specified comparator (as by the
   * {@link Collections#sort(List, Comparator) Collections.sort(List, Comparator)} method), prior to
   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *

                    .field(fessConfig.getIndexFieldSegment())
                    .size(maxSessionIdsInList)
                    .order(BucketOrder.key(false));
            queryRequestBuilder.addAggregation(termsBuilder);
            queryRequestBuilder.setPreference(Constants.SEARCH_PREFERENCE_LOCAL);
            return true;

            assertEquals(encoded, decoded);
            assertArrayEquals(ciphers, decodedContext.getCiphers());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should preserve cipher order")
        void testCipherOrderPreservation() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            int[] ciphers = { 5, 3, 1, 4, 2 };

errors.invalid_query_sort_value = A ordenação especificada {0} é inválida.
errors.invalid_query_unsupported_sort_field = O campo de ordenação especificado {0} não é suportado.
errors.invalid_query_unsupported_sort_order = A ordem de ordenação especificada {0} não é suportada.
errors.invalid_query_cannot_process=Não foi possível processar a consulta especificada.
errors.crud_invalid_mode = Modo inválido. (É {1}, não {0})

				// number of items than number of online disks.
				inconsistent++
				continue
			}
			if meta.Erasure.Distribution[i] != meta.Erasure.Index {
				// Mismatch indexes with distribution order
				inconsistent++
			}
		}
	}

	erasureDistributionReliable := inconsistent <= len(partsMetadata)/2

	metaErrs := make([]error, len(errs))

	for i := range onlineDisks {

        assertEquals("https://api.example.com/users", data.getUrl());
        assertEquals(1.2f, data.getWeight(), 0.001f);
    }

    public void test_orderIndependence() {
        // Test that order of method calls doesn't matter
        RequestData data1 = RequestDataBuilder.newRequestData().url("https://example.com").weight(1.5f).get().build();

 * we recommend reading the section on Access Control in Keith Brown's
 * "The .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security" (which is also
 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing
 * the operation and the desired access bits are compared to the SID
 * and access mask of each ACE. If the SID matches, the allow/deny flags
 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"