Still, in both situations, chances are that **FastAPI** will [still be faster](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} than (or at least comparable to) your previous framework.

### Dependencies { #dependencies }

	if r.UnreadRune() == nil {
		t.Error("expected error after UnreadRune (1)")
	}
	// Test error after Read.
	_, _, err = r.ReadRune() // reset state
	if err != nil {
		t.Error("unexpected error on ReadRune (2):", err)
	}
	_, err = r.Read(buf)
	if err != nil {
		t.Error("unexpected error on Read (2):", err)
	}
	if r.UnreadRune() == nil {
		t.Error("expected error after Read (2)")
	}
	// Test error after ReadByte.

)

// tagKey returns the tag-based key to use in the pkgCache.
// It is a comma-separated string; the first part is dir, the rest tags.
// The satisfied tags are derived from context but only those that
// matter (the ones listed in the tags argument plus GOOS and GOARCH) are used.
// The tags list, which came from go/build's Package.AllTags,
// is known to be sorted.
func tagKey(dir string, context *build.Context, tags []string) string {

    return CollectSpliterators.indexed(size(), characteristics, this::get);
  }

  @Override
  int copyIntoArray(@Nullable Object[] dst, int offset) {
    // this loop is faster for RandomAccess instances, which ImmutableLists are
    int size = size();
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
      dst[offset + i] = get(i);
    }
    return offset + size;
  }

  /**

      Collection<E> collection = (Collection<E>) iterable;
      if (collection.size() <= 2L * k) {
        // In this case, just dumping the collection to an array and sorting is
        // faster than using the implementation for Iterator, which is
        // specialized for k much smaller than n.

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // c only contains E's and doesn't escape

    return Traverser.forTree(FILE_TREE);
  }

  private static final SuccessorsFunction<File> FILE_TREE =
      file -> {
        // check isDirectory() just because it may be faster than listFiles() on a non-directory
        if (file.isDirectory()) {
          File[] files = file.listFiles();
          if (files != null) {
            return unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(files));
          }

	beforeDrives := formatsToDrivesInfo(s.endpoints.Endpoints, formats, sErrs)

	res.After.Drives = make([]madmin.HealDriveInfo, len(beforeDrives))
	res.Before.Drives = make([]madmin.HealDriveInfo, len(beforeDrives))
	// Copy "after" drive state too from before.
	for k, v := range beforeDrives {
		res.Before.Drives[k] = v
		res.After.Drives[k] = v
	}

	if countErrs(sErrs, errUnformattedDisk) == 0 {

Esse desacoplamento de partes, e ser um "microframework" que pode ser estendido para cobrir exatamente o que é necessário era uma funcionalidade chave que eu queria manter.

Dada a simplicidade do Flask, ele parecia uma boa opção para construção de APIs. A próxima coisa a encontrar era um "Django REST Framework" para Flask.

/// check | **FastAPI** inspirado para

        .build(),
    )

    // First request: time out after 1s.
    client =
      client
        .newBuilder()
        .readTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(1))
        .build()
    executeSynchronously("/a").assertBody("abc")

    // Second request: time out after 250ms.
    client =
      client
        .newBuilder()
        .readTimeout(Duration.ofMillis(250))

Insbesondere können Sie <a href="https://anyio.readthedocs.io/en/stable/" class="external-link" target="_blank">AnyIO</a> direkt verwenden für Ihre fortgeschrittenen nebenläufigen Anwendungsfälle, die fortgeschrittenere Muster in Ihrem eigenen Code erfordern.