assertEquals(expectedFlags, dfsRootEnum.getFlags());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Multiple server names should be handled correctly")
    void testDifferentServerNames() {
        // Test with different server names
        String[] serverNames = { "server1", "domain.local", "192.168.1.100", "FILESERVER" };

        for (String serverName : serverNames) {

          return false;
        }
      }
      return true;
    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

            // Verify command can be retrieved from parent
            assertEquals(0, response.getCommand());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should work with different buffer sizes")
        void testDifferentBufferSizes() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Minimum size buffer
            byte[] minBuffer = new byte[20];
            SMBUtil.writeInt2(17, minBuffer, 0);

        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir1));
        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir2));
        assertNotNull(directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir3));

        // Verify different scopes
        assertEquals(DirectoryCacheScope.IMMEDIATE_CHILDREN, directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir1).getScope());
        assertEquals(DirectoryCacheScope.METADATA_ONLY, directoryLeaseManager.getCacheEntry(dir2).getScope());

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    <T> void withoutBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings({
      "unused",
      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't

import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link ForwardingWrapperTester}. Live in a different package to detect reflection
 * access issues, if any.
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
public class ForwardingWrapperTesterTest extends TestCase {

        // Verify configuration is used - getPid() is called in parent constructor
        verify(mockConfig, atLeastOnce()).getPid();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test transaction response with different commands")
    void testTransactionResponseWithDifferentCommands() {
        // Test with TRANSACTION command
        TestSmbComTransactionResponse resp1 =

            assertEquals(3, result.size());
        }

        // Verify close was called
        verify(autoCloseableHandle, times(1)).close();
    }

    /**
     * Test multiple watch calls returning different results
     */
    @Test
    void testMultipleWatchCalls() throws CIFSException {
        // Setup mock behavior for multiple calls
        List<FileNotifyInformation> firstBatch = Arrays.asList(fileNotifyInfo1);

        byte[] buffer = new byte[20];
        long expectedIndexNumber = 0xCAFEBABEDEADBEEFL;
        SMBUtil.writeInt8(expectedIndexNumber, buffer, 0);

        // Decode with different length parameters
        int bytesDecoded1 = fileInternalInfo.decode(buffer, 0, 5); // Less than needed
        assertEquals(8, bytesDecoded1); // Should still return 8