assertEquals(0, c2.compareTo(c1), "expected " + v2 + " == " + v1);
    }

    private void checkVersionsArrayEqual(String[] array) {
        // compare against each other (including itself)
        for (int i = 0; i < array.length; ++i) {
            for (int j = i; j < array.length; ++j) {
                checkVersionsEqual(array[i], array[j]);
            }
        }

        assertEquals(16L, MemoryUtil.sizeOf(Boolean.TRUE));
        assertEquals(16L, MemoryUtil.sizeOf(Boolean.FALSE));
    }

    public void test_sizeOf_complexNestedStructures() {
        // Complex nested structure
        Map<String, Object> complexMap = new HashMap<>();
        complexMap.put("strings", Arrays.asList("test1", "test2"));
        complexMap.put("numbers", Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3));

        // Test with null permissions
        user = new TestFessUser("testuser", new String[] {}, new String[] {}, null);
        assertNull(user.getPermissions());

        // Test with complex permission strings
        permissions = new String[] { "admin:*", "user:read", "document:write:123" };
        user = new TestFessUser("testuser", new String[] {}, new String[] {}, permissions);

    if (value < 0) {
      bigInt = bigInt.setBit(Long.SIZE - 1);
    }
    return bigInt;
  }

  @Override
  public int compareTo(UnsignedLong o) {
    checkNotNull(o);
    return UnsignedLongs.compare(value, o.value);
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return Long.hashCode(value);
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {

To send data, you should use one of: `POST` (the more common), `PUT`, `DELETE` or `PATCH`.

Sending a body with a `GET` request has an undefined behavior in the specifications, nevertheless, it is supported by FastAPI, only for very complex/extreme use cases.

As it is discouraged, the interactive docs with Swagger UI won't show the documentation for the body when using `GET`, and proxies in the middle might not support it.

///

         * Android), the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances of our
         * TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users compare TypeVariables from
         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three

        // "other" parameter is missing

        Object result = scriptEngine.evaluate(template, paramMap);
        assertEquals("Hello Bob and ${other}", result);
    }

    // Test evaluate method with complex object as parameter
    public void test_evaluate_withComplexObject() {
        String template = "User: ${user.name}, Age: ${user.age}";
        Map<String, Object> paramMap = new HashMap<>();

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getters return expected values using mocks")
    void testGetters() throws Exception {
        // Use mocking to test getters without complex PAC data creation
        PacLogonInfo logonInfo = mock(PacLogonInfo.class);

        // Setup mock responses
        when(logonInfo.getUserName()).thenReturn(TEST_USERNAME);

 *
 * Features:
 * - Simple state management (CLOSED, OPEN, HALF_OPEN)
 * - Lock-free atomic operations
 * - Configurable thresholds and timeouts
 * - No complex dependencies
 */
public class SimpleCircuitBreaker {

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SimpleCircuitBreaker.class);

    /**
     * Circuit breaker states
     */

	c.Minio.Release = ""
	crc := hashDeterministicString(c.Meta)
	c.Meta = nil

	if bts, err := c.MarshalMsg(metaDataPoolGet()); err == nil {
		crc ^= xxhash.Sum64(bts)
		metaDataPoolPut(bts)
	}

	// Combine upper and lower part
	var tmp [4]byte
	binary.LittleEndian.PutUint32(tmp[:], uint32(crc^(crc>>32)))
	return tmp
}

// XL metadata constants.
const (
	// XL meta version.
	xlMetaVersion101 = "1.0.1"