Si revisas la aplicación anterior, en la interfaz verás que, hasta ahora, permite al cliente decidir el `id` del `Hero` a crear. 😱

No deberíamos permitir que eso suceda, podrían sobrescribir un `id` que ya tenemos asignado en la base de datos. Decidir el `id` debería ser tarea del **backend** o la **base de datos**, **no del cliente**.

    @Required
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Long id;

    /**
     * Returns a display-friendly identifier combining the dictionary ID and entry ID.
     * This method creates a composite identifier for UI display purposes.
     *
     * @return A string in the format "dictId:id" for display purposes
     */
    public String getDisplayId() {
        return dictId + ":" + id;
    }

}

type Tools struct {
	gorm.Model
	Name     string
	CustomID string
	Type     string
}

type Company struct {
	ID   int
	Name string
}

type Language struct {
	Code string `gorm:"primarykey"`
	Name string
}

type Coupon struct {
	ID               int              `gorm:"primarykey; size:255"`
	AppliesToProduct []*CouponProduct `gorm:"foreignKey:CouponId;constraint:OnDelete:CASCADE"`

                <la:hidden property="crudMode"/>
                <la:hidden property="dictId"/>
                <c:if test="${crudMode==2}">
                    <la:hidden property="id"/>
                </c:if>
                <div class="row">
                    <div class="col-md-12">
                        <div

        String uuid = "123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000";
        searchRenderData.setQueryId(uuid);
        assertEquals(uuid, searchRenderData.getQueryId());

        // Test with simple ID
        searchRenderData.setQueryId("query-001");
        assertEquals("query-001", searchRenderData.getQueryId());
    }

    public void test_toString() {
        // Test with default values

			"INSERT INTO `users` (`created_at`,`updated_at`,`deleted_at`,`name`,`age`,`birthday`,`company_id`,`manager_id`,`active`) VALUES (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)",
			"SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE name = ? AND `users`.`deleted_at` IS NULL ORDER BY `users`.`id` LIMIT ?",
			"SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE name = ? AND `users`.`deleted_at` IS NULL ORDER BY `users`.`id` LIMIT ?",

 * @see org.apache.maven.api.model.Model#getPackaging()
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface Packaging extends ExtensibleEnum {
    /**
     * The packaging id.
     */
    @Nonnull
    @Override
    String id();

    /**
     * The language of this packaging.
     */
    @Nonnull
    default Language language() {
        return type().getLanguage();
    }

    /**

source; the stable versions have bugs that prevents the Go exec wrapper to install and run
apps.

Second, the Go exec wrapper must be told the developer account signing identity, the team
id and a provisioned bundle id to use. They're specified with the environment variables
GOIOS_DEV_ID, GOIOS_TEAM_ID and GOIOS_APP_ID. The detect.go program in this directory will
attempt to auto-detect suitable values. Run it as

	go run detect.go

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

    private OptionalEntity<CrawlingInfo> crawlingInfo;

    public String getId() {
        return asDocMeta().id();
    }

    public void setId(final String id) {
        asDocMeta().id(id);
    }

    public Long getVersionNo() {
        return asDocMeta().version();
    }

    public void setVersionNo(final Long version) {

import com.vanniktech.maven.publish.JavadocJar
import com.vanniktech.maven.publish.KotlinJvm

plugins {
  kotlin("jvm")
  id("org.jetbrains.dokka")
  id("com.vanniktech.maven.publish.base")
  id("binary-compatibility-validator")
}

tasks.jar {
  manifest {
    attributes("Automatic-Module-Name" to "mockwebserver3.junit4")
  }
}

dependencies {
  api(projects.okhttp)
  api(projects.mockwebserver3)
  api(libs.junit)