They are more relevant for older versions, before OpenAPI 3.1.0 was available.

You can consider this a brief OpenAPI and JSON Schema **history lesson**. 🤓

///

/// warning

These are very technical details about the standards **JSON Schema** and **OpenAPI**.

If the ideas above already work for you, that might be enough, and you probably don't need these details, feel free to skip them.

///

 * <code>getByName</code>, and
 * <code>getAllByAddress</code> to create a new NbtAddress instance. This
 * class is symmetric with {@link java.net.InetAddress}.
 *
 *
 *  * <b>About NetBIOS:</b> The NetBIOS name
 * service is a dynamic distributed service that allows hosts to resolve
 * names by broadcasting a query, directing queries to a server such as

// down, collective ops may hang.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TFE_CollectiveOpsCheckPeerHealth(
    TFE_Context* ctx, const char* task, int64_t timeout_in_ms,
    TF_Status* status);

// Information about the shape of a Tensor and its type.
struct TF_ShapeAndType {
  // Number of dimensions. -1 indicates unknown rank.
  int num_dims;
  // Array of dimensions. -1 indicates unknown dim.
  int64_t* dims;

 * <code>getByName</code>, and
 * <code>getAllByAddress</code> to create a new NbtAddress instance. This
 * class is symmetric with {@link java.net.InetAddress}.
 *
 * <p><b>About NetBIOS:</b> The NetBIOS name
 * service is a dynamic distributed service that allows hosts to resolve
 * names by broadcasting a query, directing queries to a server such as

At some point, Swagger was given to the Linux Foundation, to be renamed OpenAPI.

That's why when talking about version 2.0 it's common to say "Swagger", and for version 3+ "OpenAPI".

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to

Adopt and use an open standard for API specifications, instead of a custom schema.

■特定商取引法に基づく表示
http://www.jp.playstation.com/R/aboutstore

■よくあるお問い合わせ（FAQ）
http://www.jp.playstation.com/support/

■株式会社ソニー・コンピュータエンタテインメントの個人情報保護方針
http://www.jp.playstation.com/about/privacy.html

    // do n swaps, minus a delta (0 or 2 for Reversal, gcd(d, n) for Successive), so that's about
    // twice as many reads and writes. But benchmarking shows that they usually perform better than
    // Dolphin. Reversal is about as good as Successive on average, and it is much simpler,
    // especially since we already have a `reverse` method.
    checkNotNull(array);

        // But importantly, there should be no race condition errors
        assertEquals(threadCount, failureCount.get());
        assertEquals(0, successCount.get());

        // All exceptions should be about endpoint being blank
        for (Exception e : exceptions) {
            assertTrue(e instanceof IOException);
            assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("endpoint is blank"));
        }
    }

    /**

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Statistics about the performance of a {@link Cache}. Instances of this class are immutable.
 *
 * <p>Cache statistics are incremented according to the following rules:
 *
 * <ul>

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Statistics about the performance of a {@link Cache}. Instances of this class are immutable.
 *
 * <p>Cache statistics are incremented according to the following rules:
 *
 * <ul>