*
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)
     * and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null
     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>
    </profile>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>
    </profile>

* installation
* activation
* update
* deactivation
* un-installation

When a plugin is installed we may want to check the license and make users agree. We may also want to unpack the given plugin in a particular location.

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/Why-we-deprecated-Throwables.propagate">Why we

   * java.util.function.Function) Collectors.toMap(Function, Function)}, which throws an {@code
   * IllegalStateException}.)
   *
   * @since 33.2.0 (available since 21.0 in guava-jre)
   */
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using streams.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, K extends Enum<K>, V>
      Collector<T, ?, ImmutableMap<K, V>> toImmutableEnumMap(

다음 인증 정보를 사용하십시오:

Username: `johndoe`
Password: `secret`

/// check

코드 어디에도 평문 패스워드 "`secret`" 이 없다는 점에 유의하십시오. 해시된 버전만 있습니다.

///

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image08.png">

`/users/me/` 를 호출하면 다음과 같은 응답을 얻을 수 있습니다:

```JSON
{
  "username": "johndoe",
  "email": "******@****.***",
  "full_name": "John Doe",
  "disabled": false
}
```

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Provides static methods for working with {@code Collection} instances.
 *
 * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> several common uses for this class are now more comprehensively
 * addressed by the new {@link java.util.stream.Stream} library. Read the method documentation below

        <field>
          <name>goal</name>
          <required>true</required>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>
          <description>
            The goal name for the Mojo, that users will reference from the command line to execute the Mojo directly,
            or inside a POM in order to provide Mojo-specific configuration.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>

         *   of our TypeVariable implementation.
         *
         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against
         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that