All community contributions in this pull request are licensed to the project maintainers
under the terms of the [Apache 2 license](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0). 
By creating this pull request I represent that I have the right to license the 
contributions to the project maintainers under the Apache 2 license.

## Description


## Motivation and Context


## How to test this PR?


## Types of changes

            return (result == NULL_PLACEHOLDER) ? null : result;
          },
          Collector.Characteristics.UNORDERED);

  /**
   * A collector that takes a stream containing exactly one element and returns that element. The
   * returned collector throws an {@code IllegalArgumentException} if the stream consists of two or
   * more elements, and a {@code NoSuchElementException} if the stream is empty.
   */

   * on {@link Platform} so that we can have different behavior in GWT.
   *
   * <p>This implementation tries to be smart in a number of ways. It recognizes cases where the
   * negation is cheaper to precompute than the matcher itself; it tries to build small hash tables
   * for matchers that only match a few characters, and so on. In the worst-case scenario, it

</div>

I'm the creator of **FastAPI**. You can read more about that in [Help FastAPI - Get Help - Connect with the author](help-fastapi.md#connect-with-the-author){.internal-link target=_blank}.

...But here I want to show you the community.

---

**FastAPI** receives a lot of support from the community. And I want to highlight their contributions.

These are the people that:

        super.setUp();
        fessLabels = new FessLabels();
    }

    /**
     * Test that assertPropertyNotNull throws exception for null input
     */
    public void test_assertPropertyNotNull_withNull() {
        try {
            // Create a test instance that extends FessLabels
            TestFessLabels labels = new TestFessLabels();
            labels.testAssertPropertyNotNull(null);

This release contains changes that address the following vulnerabilities:

### CVE-2021-25735: Validating Admission Webhook does not observe some previous fields

A security issue was discovered in kube-apiserver that could allow node
updates to bypass a Validating Admission Webhook. You are only affected
by this vulnerability if you run a Validating Admission Webhook for Nodes

If you are using containers, for example with Docker or Kubernetes, I'll tell you more about that in the next chapter: [FastAPI in Containers - Docker](docker.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

In particular, when running on **Kubernetes** you will probably **not** want to use workers and instead run **a single Uvicorn process per container**, but I'll tell you about it later in that chapter.

///

## Multiple Workers { #multiple-workers }

	"github.com/minio/pkg/v3/policy"
)

// http Header "x-amz-content-sha256" == "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD" indicates that the
// client did not calculate sha256 of the payload.
const unsignedPayload = "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD"

// http Header "x-amz-content-sha256" == "STREAMING-UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD-TRAILER" indicates that the
// client did not calculate sha256 of the payload and there is a trailer.

    }
    // The top bit is set, which means that the double value is going to come from the top 53 bits.
    // So we can ignore the bottom 11, except for rounding. We can unsigned-shift right 1, aka
    // unsigned-divide by 2, and convert that. Then we'll get exactly half of the desired double
    // value. But in the specific case where the bottom two bits of the original number are 01, we
    // want to replace that with 1 in the shifted value for correct rounding.

	}
	return false
}

// S3 docs: "Each form field that you specify in a form (except x-amz-signature, file, policy, and field names
// that have an x-ignore- prefix) must appear in the list of conditions."
// https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sigv4-HTTPPOSTConstructPolicy.html
// keyInPolicyExceptions - list of keys that, when present in the form, can be missing in the conditions of the policy.