}

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */
  protected void expectMissing(E... elements) {
    for (E element : elements) {
      assertFalse("Should not contain " + element, actualContents().contains(element));

   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableLongArray copyOf(Iterable<Long> values) {
    if (values instanceof Collection) {
      return copyOf((Collection<Long>) values);
    }
    return builder().addAll(values).build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing all the values from {@code stream}, in order.
   *

        crawlingInfoBhv.insertOrUpdate(crawlingInfo, op -> op.setRefreshPolicy(Constants.TRUE));

    }

    /**
     * Deletes a crawling information record and all its associated parameters.
     * First deletes all related CrawlingInfoParam records, then deletes the main record
     * with immediate refresh to ensure consistency.
     *
     * @param crawlingInfo the crawling information entity to delete

      extends TestIntegerListGenerator {
    @Override
    protected List<Integer> create(Integer[] elements) {
      Integer[] suffix = {Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE};
      Integer[] all = concat(elements, suffix);
      return makeArray(all).subArray(0, elements.length).asList();
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // used only from suite
  public static final class ImmutableIntArrayTailSubListAsListGenerator

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that all pairs of {@code T} values within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} are ordered
   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code

ent1\\work\\f63322e10dd6b396\\intTestHomeDir\\distributions-full --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.lang.invoke=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.prefs/java.util.prefs=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.nio.charset=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.net=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.util.concurrent.atomic=ALL-UNNAMED -Xms256m -Xmx1024m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Djava.io.tmpdir=C:\\tcagent1\\work\\f63322e10dd...

      name: String,
      value: String,
    ) = apply {
      headers.add(name, value)
    }

    /** Removes all headers named [name] on this builder. */
    open fun removeHeader(name: String) =
      apply {
        headers.removeAll(name)
      }

    /** Removes all headers on this builder and adds [headers]. */
    open fun headers(headers: Headers) =
      apply {

   * {@link #escape(int)} for each of them. If the semantics of your escaper are such that code
   * points in the supplementary range are either all escaped or all unescaped, this method can be
   * implemented more efficiently using {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *
   * <p>Note however that if your escaper does not escape characters in the supplementary range, you

   *   implemented below). This is a bit surprising with putIfAbsent, which really becomes
   *   putIfZero.
   *
   * - Allow putIfAbsent and replace to distinguish between zero and absent, but don't implement
   *   remove(K, long). Without any two-phase operations it becomes feasible for all remaining
   *   operations to distinguish between zero and absent. If we do this, then perhaps we should add
   *   replace(key, long).
   *

import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Generated tests for {@link Monitor}.
 *
 * <p>This test class generates all of its own test cases in the {@link #suite()} method. Every
 * {@code enterXxx}, {@code tryEnterXxx}, and {@code waitForXxx} method of the {@code Monitor} class