*   Make crictl command more user friendly and add more subcommands.
    *   Integrate with CRI verbose option to provide extra debug information.
    *   Update CRI to kubernetes v1.9.
    *   Bug fixes in validation test suites.

### Bug or Regression

- EndpointSlice IP validation now matches Endpoints IP validation. ([#101084](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/101084), [@robscott](https://github.com/robscott)) [SIG Apps and Network]

```

그리고 역시나 모든 에디터 도움을 받게 되겠죠.

<img src="/img/python-types/image06.png">

## Pydantic 모델

<a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pydantic</a>은 데이터 검증(Validation)을 위한 파이썬 라이브러리입니다.

당신은 속성들을 포함한 클래스 형태로 "모양(shape)"을 선언할 수 있습니다.

그리고 각 속성은 타입을 가지고 있습니다.

이 클래스를 활용하여서 값을 가지고 있는 인스턴스를 만들게 되면, 필요한 경우에는 적당한 타입으로 변환까지 시키기도 하여 데이터가 포함된 객체를 반환합니다.

}

func (s *Server) NotReady() {
	s.isReady.Store(false)
}

// buildKubeClient creates the kube client
func buildKubeClient(kubeConfig string) (kube.Client, error) {
	// Used by validation
	kubeRestConfig, err := kube.DefaultRestConfig(kubeConfig, "", func(config *rest.Config) {
		config.QPS = 80
		config.Burst = 160
	})
	if err != nil {

message ResourceClaimTemplateSpec {
  // ObjectMeta may contain labels and annotations that will be copied into the PVC
  // when creating it. No other fields are allowed and will be rejected during
  // validation.
  // +optional
  optional k8s.io.apimachinery.pkg.apis.meta.v1.ObjectMeta metadata = 1;

  // Spec for the ResourceClaim. The entire content is copied unchanged

container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to be redirected to the API Server through its private network.

The merged fix enforces validation against the proxying address for a Node. In some cases, the fix can break clients that depend on the `nodes/proxy` subresource, specifically if a kubelet...

   *
   * If a challenge uses the `token68` variant instead of auth params, there is exactly one
   * auth param in the challenge at key null. Invalid headers and challenges are ignored.
   * No semantic validation is done, for example that `Basic` auth must have a `realm`
   * auth param, this is up to the caller that interprets these challenges.
   */
  fun challenges(): List<Challenge> {
    return headers.parseChallenges(

		},
		Extensions: make(map[string]string),
	}, nil
}

func validateKey(c ssh.ConnMetadata, clientKey ssh.PublicKey) (err error) {
	if caPublicKey == nil {
		return errors.New("public key authority validation requested but no ca public key specified.")
	}

	cert, ok := clientKey.(*ssh.Certificate)
	if !ok {
		return errSftpPublicKeyWithoutCert
	}

	PartNumber          int                 // only useful in case of GetObject/HeadObject
	CheckPrecondFn      CheckPreconditionFn // only set during GetObject/HeadObject/CopyObjectPart preconditional valuation
	EvalMetadataFn      EvalMetadataFn      // only set for retention settings, meant to be used only when updating metadata in-place.

    } else {
      assertThat(certificateSANs(peerCertificate))
        .containsExactly("*.bar.com", "*.������.co.jp")
    }

    // try the foo.com variations
    assertThat(verifier.verify("foo.com", session)).isFalse()
    assertThat(verifier.verify("www.foo.com", session)).isFalse()
    assertThat(verifier.verify("\u82b1\u5b50.foo.com", session)).isFalse()