Mas quando você importa `Query`, `Path`, `Depends`, `Security` entre outros de `fastapi`, eles são na verdade funções que retornam classes especiais.

///

## Utilize `SecurityScopes`

Agora atualize a dependência `get_current_user`.

Este é o usado pelas dependências acima.

        assertEquals("plugin", artifact.getName());
        assertEquals("", artifact.getVersion());
    }

    // Test inner classes
    public void test_Artifact_constructor() {
        Artifact artifact = new Artifact("test", "1.0.0", "http://test.com/test.jar");
        assertEquals("test", artifact.getName());

      return mapGenerator;
    }
  }

  // TODO: investigate some API changes to SampleElements that would tidy up
  // parts of the following classes.

  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      TestSetGenerator<K> keySetGenerator(
          OneSizeTestContainerGenerator<Map<K, V>, Entry<K, V>> mapGenerator) {

 *
 */
public class DocumentHelper {
    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(DocumentHelper.class);

    /** Prefix used for encoded similar document hashes */
    protected static final String SIMILAR_DOC_HASH_PREFIX = "$";

    /**
     * Default constructor for DocumentHelper.
     * Creates a new document helper instance.
     */
    public DocumentHelper() {

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>empty string becomes .
   *   <li>. stays as .
   *   <li>fold out ./
   *   <li>fold out ../ when possible
   *   <li>collapse multiple slashes
   *   <li>delete trailing slashes (unless the path is just "/")
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>These heuristics do not always match the behavior of the filesystem. In particular, consider

##### Porque usar hashing de senha

Se o seu banco de dados for roubado, o ladrão não terá as senhas em texto simples dos seus usuários, apenas os hashes.

Assim, o ladrão não poderá tentar usar essas mesmas senhas em outro sistema (como muitos usuários usam a mesma senha em todos os lugares, isso seria perigoso).

        new LinkedBlockingDeque<Object>(10),
        new PriorityBlockingQueue<Object>(10, Ordering.arbitrary()));
  }

  /*
   * We need to perform operations in a thread pool, even for simple cases, because the queue might
   * be a SynchronousQueue.
   */
  private ExecutorService threadPool;

  @Override
  public void setUp() {
    threadPool = newCachedThreadPool();
  }

  @Override

        assertEquals('9', Hexdump.HEX_DIGITS[9]);
        assertEquals('A', Hexdump.HEX_DIGITS[10]);
        assertEquals('F', Hexdump.HEX_DIGITS[15]);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle edge cases in toHexChars")
    void testToHexCharsEdgeCases() {
        // Test with zero
        char[] dst1 = new char[4];
        java.util.Arrays.fill(dst1, 'X');
        Hexdump.toHexChars(0, dst1, 0, 4);

		info         ObjectInfo
		name         string
		rcfg         replicationConfig
		dsc          ReplicateDecision
		tgtStatuses  map[string]replication.StatusType
		expectedSync bool
	}{
		{ // Cases 1-4: existing object replication enabled, versioning enabled, no reset - replication status varies
			// 1: Pending replication
			name: "existing object replication on object in Pending replication status",
			info: ObjectInfo{

    ): Relay {
      val randomAccessFile = RandomAccessFile(file, "rw")
      val result = Relay(randomAccessFile, upstream, 0L, metadata, bufferMaxSize)

      // Write a dirty header. That way if we crash we won't attempt to recover this.
      randomAccessFile.setLength(0L)
      result.writeHeader(PREFIX_DIRTY, -1L, -1L)

      return result
    }

    /**