* {@link #enqueue} and {@link #dispatch} are 2 different methods. It is expected that the decision
 * to run a particular event is made during the state change, but the decision to actually invoke
 * the listeners can be delayed slightly so that locks can be dropped. Also, because {@link
 * #dispatch} is expected to be called concurrently, it is idempotent.
 */
@J2ktIncompatible

 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
 * Object x = new MyClass() {
 *   ...
 *   protected void finalize() { latch.countDown(); ... }
 * };
 * x = null;  // Hint to the JIT that x is stack-unreachable
 * GcFinalization.await(latch);
 * }
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that uses a user-defined finalization predicate:
 *

            candidateSource = new FileModelSource(candidateModel.getPomFile());
        }

        //
        // TODO jvz Why isn't all this checking the job of the duty of the workspace resolver, we know that we
        // have a model that is suitable, yet more checks are done here and the one for the version is problematic
        // before because with parents as ranges it will never work in this scenario.
        //

		b[0x11]++
		b[0x9d]++

		// TODO(bradfitz): add a new test that only corrupts
		// one of these values, and verify that that's also an
		// error. Currently, the reader code doesn't verify the
		// fileheader and TOC's crc32 match if they're both
		// non-zero and only the second line above, the TOC,
		// is what matters.
	})
}

// rZipBytes returns the bytes of a recursive zip file, without

- Fixed a bug that caused duplicate validation when updating `Role` and `RoleBinding` resources. ([#132550](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/132550), [@gavinkflam](https://github.com/gavinkflam))

 *       to check for a cycle that reaches the lock to be acquired. If no cycle is detected, a new
 *       "safe" edge is created.
 *   <li>If a cycle is detected, an "unsafe" (cyclic) edge is created to represent a potential
 *       deadlock situation, and the appropriate Policy is executed.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Note that detection of potential deadlock does not necessarily indicate that deadlock will

 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
 * Object x = new MyClass() {
 *   ...
 *   protected void finalize() { latch.countDown(); ... }
 * };
 * x = null;  // Hint to the JIT that x is stack-unreachable
 * GcFinalization.await(latch);
 * }
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that uses a user-defined finalization predicate:
 *

The recommended way to file an issue is by running `go bug`.
Otherwise, when filing an issue, make sure to answer these five questions:

1. What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?
2. What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
3. What did you do?
4. What did you expect to see?
5. What did you see instead?

For change proposals, see [Proposing Changes To Go](https://go.dev/s/proposal-process).

## Contributing code

var (
	// ErrInvalidEncryptionMethod indicates that the specified SSE encryption method
	// is not supported.
	ErrInvalidEncryptionMethod = Errorf("The encryption method is not supported")

	// ErrInvalidCustomerAlgorithm indicates that the specified SSE-C algorithm
	// is not supported.
	ErrInvalidCustomerAlgorithm = Errorf("The SSE-C algorithm is not supported")

	// ErrMissingCustomerKey indicates that the HTTP headers contains no SSE-C client key.

	}
}

// largeReader returns an invalid count that is larger than the number
// of bytes requested.
type largeReader struct{}

func (largeReader) Read(p []byte) (int, error) {
	return len(p) + 1, nil
}

// Test that the scanner doesn't panic and returns ErrBadReadCount
// on a reader that returns an impossibly large count of bytes read (issue 38053).
func TestLargeReader(t *testing.T) {