- Sort Score
- Num 10 results
- Language All
Results 51 - 60 of 87 for workaround (0.1 seconds)
-
src/main/java/jcifs/internal/smb1/AndXServerMessageBlock.java
Created: Sun Apr 05 00:10:12 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 08:00:57 GMT 2025 - 15.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/base/Optional.java
* * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers(); * Optional<? extends Number> first = numbers.first(); * Number value = first.or(0.5); // error * } * * <p>As a workaround, it is always safe to cast an {@code Optional<? extends T>} to {@code * Optional<T>}. Casting either of the above example {@code Optional} instances to {@code
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Jun 04 13:03:16 GMT 2025 - 15.4K bytes - Click Count (0) -
README.md
Where the spec is ambiguous, OkHttp follows modern user agents such as popular Browsers or common HTTP Libraries. OkHttp is principled and avoids being overly configurable, especially when such configuration is to workaround a buggy server, test invalid scenarios or that contradict the relevant RFC. Other HTTP libraries exist that fill that gap allowing extensive customisation including potentially invalid requests. Example Limitations
Created: Fri Apr 03 11:42:14 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Oct 30 21:39:59 GMT 2025 - 9.5K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/reflect/Types.java
* TypeVariableImpl} today. (We could probably then make {@code TypeVariableImpl} implement {@code * AnnotatedElement} so that we get partial compile-time checking.) * * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when <a * href="https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/115932459">Android supports {@code * AnnotatedType}</a>. */ @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Oct 31 19:34:24 GMT 2025 - 24.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/base/Optional.java
* * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers(); * Optional<? extends Number> first = numbers.first(); * Number value = first.or(0.5); // error * } * * <p>As a workaround, it is always safe to cast an {@code Optional<? extends T>} to {@code * Optional<T>}. Casting either of the above example {@code Optional} instances to {@code
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Jun 04 13:03:16 GMT 2025 - 15.1K bytes - Click Count (0) -
cmd/generic-handlers.go
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { if origin := w.Header().Get("Access-Control-Allow-Origin"); origin == "null" { // This is a workaround change to ensure that "Origin: null" // incoming request to a response back as "*" instead of "null" w.Header().Set("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*") } if globalDNSConfig == nil || !globalBucketFederation ||
Created: Sun Apr 05 19:28:12 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Aug 29 02:39:48 GMT 2025 - 20.7K bytes - Click Count (1) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/base/Converter.java
* existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere * near enough users to justify the costs. *
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Jun 18 21:43:06 GMT 2025 - 22.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableSortedSetTest.java
public void testOf_ordering() { SortedSet<String> set = of("e", "a", "f", "b", "d", "c"); assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f").inOrder(); } /* * Tests that we workaround GWT bug #3621 (or that it is already fixed). * * A call to of() with a parameter that is not a plain Object[] (here, * Interface[]) creates a RegularImmutableSortedSet backed by an array of that
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Mar 13 13:01:07 GMT 2026 - 46.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/base/Converter.java
* existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere * near enough users to justify the costs. *
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Jun 18 21:43:06 GMT 2025 - 22.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableSortedSetTest.java
public void testOf_ordering() { SortedSet<String> set = of("e", "a", "f", "b", "d", "c"); assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f").inOrder(); } /* * Tests that we workaround GWT bug #3621 (or that it is already fixed). * * A call to of() with a parameter that is not a plain Object[] (here, * Interface[]) creates a RegularImmutableSortedSet backed by an array of that
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Mar 13 13:01:07 GMT 2026 - 47.2K bytes - Click Count (0)