"rule before", "setup", "unrolled test: 1: isFluid: false", "cleanup", "rule after",
            "rule before", "setup", "unrolled test: 1: isFluid: true", "cleanup", "rule after",
            "rule before", "setup", "unrolled test: 2: isFluid: false", "cleanup", "rule after",
            "rule before", "setup", "unrolled test: 2: isFluid: true", "cleanup", "rule after",

apiVersion: release-notes/v2
kind: feature
area: istioctl
issue:
  - 50396
releaseNotes:
- |

package bigmod

import "internal/cpu"

// amd64 assembly uses ADCX/ADOX/MULX if ADX is available to run two carry
// chains in the flags in parallel across the whole operation, and aggressively
// unrolls loops. arm64 processes four words at a time.
//
// It's unclear why the assembly for all other architectures, as well as for
// amd64 without ADX, perform better than the compiler output.

package schema

import (
	"testing"
)

// TestStructuralUnfoldNilValueValidation tests that Unfold() does not crash
// on a IntOrString pattern with nil ValueValidation.
func TestStructuralUnfoldIntOrString(t *testing.T) {
	schema := Structural{
		Extensions: Extensions{
			XIntOrString: true,
		},
	}
	schema.Unfold()

            return FormatType.FAVORITES;
        }
        if (FormatType.PING.name().equals(type)) {
            return FormatType.PING;
        }
        if (FormatType.SCROLL.name().equals(type)) {
            return FormatType.SCROLL;
        }
        if (FormatType.SUGGEST.name().equals(type)) {
            return FormatType.SUGGEST;
        }

        // default
        return FormatType.OTHER;
    }

	MOVQ x+24(FP), R8
	MOVQ y+48(FP), R9
	MOVQ z+0(FP), R10

	MOVQ $0, CX		// c = 0
	MOVQ $0, SI		// i = 0

	// s/JL/JMP/ below to disable the unrolled loop
	SUBQ $4, DI		// n -= 4
	JL V1			// if n < 0 goto V1

U1:	// n >= 0
	// regular loop body unrolled 4x
	ADDQ CX, CX		// restore CF
	MOVQ 0(R8)(SI*8), R11
	MOVQ 8(R8)(SI*8), R12
	MOVQ 16(R8)(SI*8), R13
	MOVQ 24(R8)(SI*8), R14
	ADCQ 0(R9)(SI*8), R11

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

opt<bool> unfold_batchmatmul(
    "unfold_batchmatmul",
    llvm::cl::desc(
        "Whether to unfold TF BatchMatMul to a set of TFL FullyConnected ops."),
    llvm::cl::init(false));

// NOLINTNEXTLINE
opt<bool> unfold_large_splat_constant(
    "unfold-large-splat-constant",
    llvm::cl::desc("Whether to unfold large splat constant tensors to reduce "
                   "the generated model size."),

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

	MOVD $0, R4  // c = 0
	MOVD $0, R0  // make sure it's zero
	MOVD $0, R10 // i = 0

	// s/JL/JMP/ below to disable the unrolled loop
	SUB $4, R3
	BLT v1
	SUB $12, R3 // n -= 16
	BLT A1      // if n < 0 goto A1

	MOVD R8, R5
	MOVD R9, R6
	MOVD R2, R7

	// n >= 0
	// regular loop body unrolled 16x
	VZERO V0 // c = 0

UU1:
	VLM  0(R5), V1, V4    // 64-bytes into V1..V8
	ADD  $64, R5